2007
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural activations at the junction of the inferior frontal sulcus and the inferior precentral sulcus: Interindividual variability, reliability, and association with sulcal morphology

Abstract: The sulcal morphology of the human frontal lobe is highly variable. Although the structural images usually acquired in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies provide information about this interindividual variability, this information is only rarely used to relate structure and function. Here, we investigated the spatial relationship between posterior frontolateral activations in a taskswitching paradigm and the junction of the inferior frontal sulcus and the inferior precentral sulcus (inferior frontal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
61
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(73 reference statements)
8
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four regions within the cerebral language system were chosen for a neurochemical analysis. However, it is well established that there are crucial neuroanatomical variations across subjects in terms of location and function [2,3] that persist to a substantial degree after normalization into a common anatomical space [33,38,39,40] and that are particularly relevant with respect to the functional specification of cerebral language regions [41]. A possible reason for inconsistencies between functional imaging studies of the language system is the application of group analyses in most of the investigations, which might have resulted in an underestimation of individual differences [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four regions within the cerebral language system were chosen for a neurochemical analysis. However, it is well established that there are crucial neuroanatomical variations across subjects in terms of location and function [2,3] that persist to a substantial degree after normalization into a common anatomical space [33,38,39,40] and that are particularly relevant with respect to the functional specification of cerebral language regions [41]. A possible reason for inconsistencies between functional imaging studies of the language system is the application of group analyses in most of the investigations, which might have resulted in an underestimation of individual differences [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might account for the lack of IFJ activation in Hedden and Gabrieli (2010). Although the IFJ was found to be reliably involved in task switching , even when individual differences in sulcal anatomy were taken into account (Derrfuss, Brass, von Cramon, Lohmann, & Amunts, 2009), the IFJ seems to be particularly critical for the updating of task rule representations, which is clearly not required when applying the same task rule to global versus local features of the same object.…”
Section: Common and Differential Brain Activity And Connectivity For mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Structure-based and BA-based searches are unsatisfactory because nearby activations might receive different anatomical labels or different BA designations, and activations quite distant from one another might be given identical anatomical labels or BA designations. For example, activations close to the junction of the inferior frontal sulcus and the inferior precentral sulcus Derrfuss et al, 2004Derrfuss et al, , 2005Derrfuss et al, , 2009) might be referred to as lying in the inferior precentral sulcus, the inferior frontal sulcus, the precentral gyrus, the middle frontal gyrus, the inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis, Broca's area, the premotor cortex, or the inferior frontal junction. On the other hand, activations in the most ventral and the most dorsal part of the posterior frontal cortex might both receive the label "precentral gyrus" or "BA 6," although these activations might lie as far as 60 mm apart.…”
Section: How Can We Go About Finding These Studies?mentioning
confidence: 99%