2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.08.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Networks of volatility spillovers among stock markets

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(79 reference statements)
3
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our analysis, we find that (a) European developed markets are the most connected markets; (b) emerging and frontier markets are (apart from a few exceptions) still not strongly connected, even after the GFC; (c) geographical proximity matters, especially in propagating negative shocks; and (d) stock market connectedness increased after the GFC, from both short-and long-term perspectives and for extreme positive and extreme negative returns. In general, our results are in line with extant literature on stock market networks (e.g., Coelho et al, 2007;Baumöhl et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In our analysis, we find that (a) European developed markets are the most connected markets; (b) emerging and frontier markets are (apart from a few exceptions) still not strongly connected, even after the GFC; (c) geographical proximity matters, especially in propagating negative shocks; and (d) stock market connectedness increased after the GFC, from both short-and long-term perspectives and for extreme positive and extreme negative returns. In general, our results are in line with extant literature on stock market networks (e.g., Coelho et al, 2007;Baumöhl et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This paper reports that emerging markets are less linked to the developed market in terms of returns and weak co-movement between stock markets. More recently, Baumöhl et al (2018) show the persistence of significant temporal proximity effects between markets and somewhat weaker temporal effects with regard to the US equity market, provide evidence of volatility spillovers that present a high degree of interconnectedness. The models used in this paper are ARFIMAX-GARCH.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As the increased fluctuation in the foreign exchange markets is proved to induce higher volatility spillover in the stock market [10], sufficient exchange reserves can be regarded as a buffer stock to respond to fluctuations in international payments, ensuring that countries can calmly respond to sudden financial crisis and meet the demands for maintaining stable local currency exchange [32]. (2) External debt: Both the external debt sender and receiver effects are negative in subprime crisis.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Weighted Connectedness Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inner logic of financial networks is that the intricate connectedness, either physical based on bilateral exposures/flows between financial institutions, or association-based depicting return dependency among financial markets, could be captured and analyzed in complex financial systems using a network approach [1,2,6]. The network approach, which describes relationship architecture and regularities involved in complex multivariate systems, has become a powerful tool in financial crises early warning and tracking [7,8], risk spillover sources tracing [9,10], or exploitation of asset allocation [11,12]. Three research paradigms exist in the current financial network literature [1], namely, (i) mean-spillover network or Granger-causality network [13], (ii) volatility spillover network represented by variance decomposition-based network [14] and GARCH-based network [15], and (iii) risk spillover network with the main forms in tail-risk driven network [16] and extreme risk network [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation