2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Networking, context and firm-level innovation: Cooperation through the regional filter in Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this angle, the importance of the regional scale is caused by externalities of geographical proximity: face-to-face contacts are essential for the development of trust, and informal communications allow for a transmission of tacit knowledge. Both drive the processes of interactive innovation (Fitjar and Rodríguez-Pose 2015). In verifying this argument, some recent empirical studies have clearly shown that firms tend to search for new cooperation actors or establish branches in similarly specialized clusters and/or metropolitan areas so as to obtain more unconscious knowledge spillover (Poon et al 2013;Boschma et al 2014;Gabe and Abel 2016).…”
Section: Regional Environmentmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…From this angle, the importance of the regional scale is caused by externalities of geographical proximity: face-to-face contacts are essential for the development of trust, and informal communications allow for a transmission of tacit knowledge. Both drive the processes of interactive innovation (Fitjar and Rodríguez-Pose 2015). In verifying this argument, some recent empirical studies have clearly shown that firms tend to search for new cooperation actors or establish branches in similarly specialized clusters and/or metropolitan areas so as to obtain more unconscious knowledge spillover (Poon et al 2013;Boschma et al 2014;Gabe and Abel 2016).…”
Section: Regional Environmentmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…At the regional level, the government and its involvement in arranging R&D is identified as the most important factor affecting the innovation configuration (Fitjar and Rodríguez-Pose 2015), especially as some small and medium-sized firms may not have the ability to engage in any innovation activities at all without government subsidies (Czarnitzki and Licht 2006). In the case of China, the government has a habitual idiosyncrasy to strengthen the innovation relation between firms and knowledge partners, which normally helps firms to transform knowledge into commercially successful products (Kafouros et al 2015).…”
Section: Government Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As Bathelt (2007) points out, both local buzz and global pipelines have only limited effects if they remain as separated spheres [9], while the combination of both concepts, namely, the buzz-pipeline model provides a new perspective for the dynamics of local knowledge creation and innovation [13,30]. However, some scholars have argued further that buzz has little value while pipelines play a leading role under some specific circumstances [49]. It is possible that the buzz-pipeline model shows mixed results in different cases [48].…”
Section: Relationships and Potential Pipelines Between Actors At Exhimentioning
confidence: 99%