Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence

Abstract

Recent work on competitiveness has emphasized the importance of business networking for innovativeness. Until recently, insights into the dynamics of this relationship have been fragmented. This paper presents a systematic review of research linking the networking behaviour of firms with their innovative capacity. We find that the principal benefits of networking as identified in the literature include: risk sharing; obtaining access to new markets and technologies; speeding products to market; pooling complementary skills; safeguarding property rights when complete or contingent contracts are not possible; and acting as a key vehicle for obtaining access to external knowledge. The evidence also illustrates that those firms which do not co‐operate and which do not formally or informally exchange knowledge limit their knowledge base long term and ultimately reduce their ability to enter into exchange relationships. At an institutional level, national systems of innovation play an important role in the diffusion of innovations in terms of the way in which they shape networking activity. The paper provides evidence suggesting that network relationships with suppliers, customers and intermediaries such as professional and trade associations are important factors affecting innovation performance and productivity. Where networks fail, it is due to inter‐firm conflict, displacement, lack of scale, external disruption and lack of infrastructure. The review identifies several gaps in the literature that need to be filled. For instance, there is a need for further exploration of the relationship between networking and different forms of innovation, such as process and organisational innovation. Similarly, we need better understanding of network dynamics and network configurations, as well as the role of third parties such as professional and trade associations. Our study highlights the need for interdisciplinary research in these areas.

Do clusters really matter for innovation practices in Information Technology? Questioning the significance of technological knowledge spillovers

“…It is widely accepted that acquiring external knowledge is crucial for the success of firms, particularly in the creative and high-technology industries (Pittaway et al, 2004). In the literature on regional learning and innovation it is often argued that firms located in innovative clusters benefit from other co-located organisations that create local knowledge spillovers (e.g.…”

Inside out: The interrelationships of sustainable performance metrics and its effect on business decision making: Theory and practice

“…Challenges encountered in this 233 study were similar to the limitations highlighted by Pittaway et al (2004) and Leseure 234 (2005). The key word search of "sustainability" is ambiguous, resulting in 235 publications from journals from multiple disciplines as well as topics outside the 236 scope of this study.…”

“…In addition, there were risks associated with filtering 240 papers based on their abstracts. As highlighted by Pittaway et al (2004), much 241 depends on the quality of the written abstract, and consequently some relevant papers 242 may have been mislabelled and excluded for the final list. To mitigate part of this risk, 243 papers whose abstracts indicated that it may fall into category either "somewhat 244 relevant" or "very relevant" were read in detail to determine whether or not they 245 belong to the later.…”

“…Adopting a rigorous systematic review methodology (Pittaway et al, 2004), this study 602 started with 17416 articles as the baseline and they were filtered down to 1074 articles 603 within the supply chain literature. The 1074 articles were reviewed and further filtered 604 down to 74 articles that were analysed in depth.…”

Coopetition Strategies in the Brazilian Higher Education

“…The popular topic of relationship networks (Jarillo, 1988) has developed into several research focuses, such as alliances (Gulati, 1998), social networking (Granovetter, 1973;Burt, 1992;Coleman, 1988), learning (Khanna, Gulati, & Nohria, 1998), innovation (Pittaway, Robertson, Munir, Denyer, & Neely, 2004), and governance (Provan & Kenis, 2007). Further, these networks are the foundation of the more recent focus of coopetition (Bengtsson & Kock, 1999Bengtsson, Eriksson, & Wincent, 2010), which is an emerging topic of relationship strategies between firms and institutions.…”