2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13237-014-0123-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Networking and Bayesian analyses of genetic affinity in cotton germplasm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are quite congruent to prior taxonomic studies [2,3,66]. The average genetic distance (GD = 0.325) revealed the overall level of genetic diversity to be high among semi-wild and cultivated accessions; this finding is similar to earlier reports [26,67,68]. However, this estimate may be inflated since data from monomorphic SSR loci were excluded in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are quite congruent to prior taxonomic studies [2,3,66]. The average genetic distance (GD = 0.325) revealed the overall level of genetic diversity to be high among semi-wild and cultivated accessions; this finding is similar to earlier reports [26,67,68]. However, this estimate may be inflated since data from monomorphic SSR loci were excluded in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…PCoA plots separated tetraploid cottons from diploid plants, supporting the AMOVA results. All these results are in good agreement with Noormohammadi et al’s genetic diversity analysis [ 68 ] between diploid and tetraploid accessions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Neophytou et al (2022) following STRUCTURE analysis used the solutions for K = 2, 4 and 6 for further investigation considering the selection of the Douglas Fir trees for breeding purposes. Noormohammadi et al (2015) through STRUCTURE analysis identified 9 distinct population groups, while K-Means clustering suggested 2-3 major genetic subgroups in the present germplasm. They intend to use the obtained results to establish a better hybridization and selection plan for cotton.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Use of efficient, low-cost and fast genetic screening method is a must for breeders to identify diverse parental genotypes when dealing with large cotton germplasm (VAN ESBROECK et al, 1998;SHEIDAI et al, 2007;SHEIDAI et al, 2008;TYAGI et al, 2014;NOORMOHAMMADI et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different types of molecular markers were used to study genetic diversity in cotton. These molecular markers were: Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), allozymes, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), simple sequence repeats (SSRs), and inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSRs) as well as retrotrasposon based molecular marker (REMAP) (see for example, VAN ESBROECK et al, 1998;ABDALLA et al, 2001;SHEIDAI et al, 2007;SHEIDAI et al, 2008;KANTARTZI et al, 2009;NOORMOHAMMADI et al, 2015;NOORMOHAMMADI et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%