2006
DOI: 10.1080/02680930600969191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network utopias and alternative entanglements for educational research and practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…And coach training may also be 'delivered' by 'on-line resources and virtual learning environments' (TDA 2009e, 6). Technology, as Strathern (2002) describes, 'points to its own potency', it signals that an endeavour is innovatory, 'cutting edge', and associations with 'the network society' connote an 'open' and expansive learning context (Frankham 2006). Technological responses also have the benefit of reinforcing the individualised nature of the MTL.…”
Section: Technology and Personalisationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…And coach training may also be 'delivered' by 'on-line resources and virtual learning environments' (TDA 2009e, 6). Technology, as Strathern (2002) describes, 'points to its own potency', it signals that an endeavour is innovatory, 'cutting edge', and associations with 'the network society' connote an 'open' and expansive learning context (Frankham 2006). Technological responses also have the benefit of reinforcing the individualised nature of the MTL.…”
Section: Technology and Personalisationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Societies of control, for Deleuze (1992), are the next iteration of power in neoliberal democracies and these societies are in the process of replacing autonomous practices of governmentality. Societies of control are a form of networked power analyzed in recent theoretical, empirical, and methodological studies of education policy (Ball and Exley 2010;Fataar 2006;Fenwick 2010;Frankham 2006). Ball (2009) discussed the idea of networked power as the activities of multiple constituents involved in educational governance.…”
Section: Journal Of Education Policy 737mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its ideal, this would approach Habermas' (1987) idea of a "lifeworld", where people can "reciprocally raise claims that their utterances fit the world (objective, social, or subjective), and where they criticize and confirm those validity claims, settle their disagreements, and arrive at agreements" (Habermas, 1987: 126). However, I do not wish to imply that agreements are necessarily the ideal, but acknowledge that disagreements are part and parcel of an educational process (Frankham, 2006).…”
Section: Implications and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%