Network structure, distribution and the growth of Chinese international research collaboration

Niu, Fenggao; Qiu, Junping

doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1170-x

Cited by 30 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The other research sub-path starts with Niu and Qiu (2014), which not only applied a bibliometric approach and but also introduced a social network perspective to highlight IRC behavior between China and its partners. Following Niu and Qiu (2014) Based on the analysis of the core studies in the main path during this period, we found that the effect of IRC has become a hot topic (e.g., Bote et al, 2013;Schmoch and Schubert, 2007;Gomez et al, 1999;Lancho Barrantes et al, 2012;Tan et al, 2015). Besides, the patterns of a particular country's collaboration with other countries have increasingly drawn the interest of scholars during this period (e.g., Li and Li, 2015;Niu and Qiu, 2014;Tan et al, 2015).…”

Section: Fig 6 the Research Main Path During 2006-2015mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Following Niu and Qiu (2014) Based on the analysis of the core studies in the main path during this period, we found that the effect of IRC has become a hot topic (e.g., Bote et al, 2013;Schmoch and Schubert, 2007;Gomez et al, 1999;Lancho Barrantes et al, 2012;Tan et al, 2015). Besides, the patterns of a particular country's collaboration with other countries have increasingly drawn the interest of scholars during this period (e.g., Li and Li, 2015;Niu and Qiu, 2014;Tan et al, 2015). However, the studies that present a global description of IRC patterns across various fields and countries are still scant except Gazni et al (2012).…”

Section: Fig 6 the Research Main Path During 2006-2015mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

International research collaboration: An emerging domain of innovation studies?

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International research collaboration (IRC) has been increasingly important as an emerging area of innovation studies. This study reviews the intellectual base, main research trajectories and intellectual communities of the IRC research domain over the period 1957-2015. It integrates qualitative review and three quantitative analyses including co-citation network analysis, main path analysis and bibliographic coupling analysis. The results show that the IRC research has gone through three phases, namely, "emergence" (1957-1991), "fermentation" (1992-2005) and "take-off" (2006-2015) phases. The co-citation network analysis confirms that the IRC research field has been developed under the influence of two pioneering studies related to bibliometrics research. The main research trajectories in IRC studies over its three development phases and over the whole period are identified based on the main path analysis, which shows that co-authorship analysis is the main research method in IRC studies. A bibliographic coupling analysis suggests that the whole IRC research domain can be classified into five distinct intellectual areas: drivers of IRC, IRC patterns, IRC effects, IRC networks and IRC measurement. Seven topics for future research are also identified.

show abstract

Section: Fig 6 the Research Main Path During 2006-2015mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Fig 6 the Research Main Path During 2006-2015mentioning

confidence: 99%

International research collaboration: An emerging domain of innovation studies?

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…collaborations (Anuradha and Urs 2007;Basu and Kumar 2000;He 2009;Niu and Qiu 2014;Wang et al 2013;Zhou and Glänzel 2010).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact analysis of domestic and international research collaborations: a Malaysian case study

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a comparative impact analysis on collaborative research in Malaysia. All analyses were conducted using ISI-indexed journal articles published in the 10-year period spanning the years 2000-2009. The publication growth and distribution of domestic versus international Malaysian-addressed collaborative articles was examined. Then, a three-pronged approach was used to compare the research performance between international and domestic research for the top ten high-productivity subject categories. Firstly, the potentiality of collaborative research impact is determined using the MannWhitney-Wilcoxon and Bootstrap Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. Then, the Hirsch and Egghe indices were computed for each subject category to estimate the distance needed to bridge the gap between international and domestic research. Lastly, the composition of researchers was measured using the internationality index. We discuss how the findings of our methodology help advise collaborative research strategies that will contribute to better research performance in the leading scientific categories.

show abstract

“…Bibliometric analysis is a kind of literature analysis tool that can objectively and quantitatively reveal the development of academic research [28,29]. It is mainly used in the fields of information science, library science, and archival science.…”

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of International Research Collaboration Network Evolution on Chinese Business School Research Quality

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The University of Texas at Dallas has proposed 24 top journals (UTD24) covering all areas related to management. UTD24 are currently the most authoritative management journals. Institutions or research scholars who have published papers in these journals are considered to have a high academic level. This study uses the paper quality published by an institution in the UTD24 journals to indicate the research quality of this institution and takes the papers published by Chinese Business School in the UTD24 journals from 2000 to 2018 as the research object. By analyzing the staged evolution process and the research hotspot of international research collaboration network (IRC network) of Chinese Business School, this paper summarizes and analyzes the factors that influence the quality of papers published by Chinese Business School in UTD24 journals: degree centrality of an institution, betweenness centrality of an institution, the degree of attention of an institution, the degree of novelty of an institution, and the number of countries cooperating with the institution. This paper divides paper quality into two parts: the total number of papers and citations per paper of an institution. Among them, degree centrality and betweenness centrality of the institution have a significant positive impact on the total number of papers of the institution. The degree of attention and the number of countries cooperating with the institution have a significant positive impact on citations per paper, and the degree of novelty has a significant negative impact on citations per paper.

show abstract

Network structure, distribution and the growth of Chinese international research collaboration

Cited by 30 publications

References 12 publications

International research collaboration: An emerging domain of innovation studies?

International research collaboration: An emerging domain of innovation studies?

Impact analysis of domestic and international research collaborations: a Malaysian case study

The Impact of International Research Collaboration Network Evolution on Chinese Business School Research Quality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About