1998
DOI: 10.2307/2393679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
566
2
26

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 783 publications
(612 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(26 reference statements)
18
566
2
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of strategic alliances, as noted, have been pitched at two levels: dyad-the pair of organizations at risk of an alliance-and node-the individual organization (Stuart, 1998). We argue for the dyad as the operational unit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyses of strategic alliances, as noted, have been pitched at two levels: dyad-the pair of organizations at risk of an alliance-and node-the individual organization (Stuart, 1998). We argue for the dyad as the operational unit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In the existing literature, some alliance studies are pitched at the dyad level, addressing how the relations and attribute combinations of the pair condition partner choice and alliance probability (Stuart, 1998). Others discuss the individual firm and how its distinctive attributes (size, financial structure, past performance) and network position (e.g., brokerage) determine the alliances it pursues (Powell, Koput, and SmithDoerr 1996).…”
Section: Alliance Formation As a Firm-level Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Put differently, we find that both faculty-founded and non-faculty founded firms perform the role of intermediary. 17 A second issue is that many of the empirical specifications in prior studies of the rate of alliance formation include some form of the lagged dependent variable (i.e., a measure of the extent of the firm's previous alliance activity) as an occurrence dependence term (e.g., Gulati, 1995;Walker et al, 1997;Stuart, 1998;Ahuja, 2000). The rationale for doing this is that the previous event count may absorb the effects of at least some unobserved, firm-specific factors that are not otherwise accounted for in the regressions.…”
Section: Extensions and Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La relación entre la centralidad en las redes de empresas con el poder que estas empresas ejercen ha sido ha sido corroborada por numerosos autores (e.g., Gulati & Gargulio, 1999;Bonacich, 1987;Stuart, 1998). Luego, una manera que utilizan los OEMs para compensar la pérdida voluntaria de poder en las RVFGs será mediante el ejercicio de un poder tácito basado en posicionamientos centralizados en la red.…”
Section: Dinámica De Los Oems En Las Rvfgsunclassified