2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network Neuroscience Theory of Human Intelligence

Abstract: An enduring aim of research in the psychological and brain sciences is to understand the nature of individual differences in human intelligence, examining the stunning breadth and diversity of intellectual abilities and the remarkable neurobiological mechanisms from which they arise. This Opinion article surveys recent neuroscience evidence to elucidate how general intelligence, g, emerges from individual differences in the network architecture of the human brain. The reviewed findings motivate new insights ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

29
222
2
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(281 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(144 reference statements)
29
222
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, these results were predicted from two different populations where loss of from information in unconsciousness suggested a common mechanism for information processing during conscious cognition. Consistent with a recent emerging view in the field 75 , they suggested that individual differences in intellectual abilities rely on the dynamic reconfigurations of connectivity in response to incoming sensory information 76 , within a widespread system comprising sensory-specific and extra-modal cortices in fronto-parietal cortex.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Notably, these results were predicted from two different populations where loss of from information in unconsciousness suggested a common mechanism for information processing during conscious cognition. Consistent with a recent emerging view in the field 75 , they suggested that individual differences in intellectual abilities rely on the dynamic reconfigurations of connectivity in response to incoming sensory information 76 , within a widespread system comprising sensory-specific and extra-modal cortices in fronto-parietal cortex.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The research conducted in the present study is unique and complements prior research conducted from this cohort (Zamroziewicz & Barbey, 2016, 2018Zamroziewicz et al, 2015Zamroziewicz, Paul, et al, 2017a, 2016aZamroziewicz, Talukdar, Zwilling, & Barbey, 2017b;Zamroziewicz, Zwilling, & Barbey, 2016b). The research conducted in the present study is unique and complements prior research conducted from this cohort (Zamroziewicz & Barbey, 2016, 2018Zamroziewicz et al, 2015Zamroziewicz, Paul, et al, 2017a, 2016aZamroziewicz, Talukdar, Zwilling, & Barbey, 2017b;Zamroziewicz, Zwilling, & Barbey, 2016b).…”
Section: Study Participantsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…PUFAs on brain and cognition in elderly adults (Bos, van Montfort, Oranje, Durston, & Smeets, 2016;Kobe et al, 2016;McNamara, Asch, Lindquist, & Krikorian, 2018;Zamroziewicz, Paul, Rubin, & Barbey, 2015;Zamroziewicz, Paul, Zwilling, & Barbey, 2017a, 2018Zwilling et al, in press). This literature provides evidence for structural changes in gray matter volume within brain regions widely implicated in executive functions (frontal and parietal cortex), episodic memory (hippocampus), and emotion (amygdala).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this suggestion needs to be tested empirically by studies investigating dynamic changes in network organization that occur during the switch from rest into task. The proposal of Barbey () postulates further that the superior “ability” of more intelligent people to adaptively form task‐specific network configurations results from differences in intrinsic small‐world network attributes, specifically, in global network integration or global network segregation levels measured in static functional brain networks (Girn et al, ). Contrasting this view, we observed no relation between global modularity and intelligence in static, time‐averaged network metrics (see also Hilger et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%