2013
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter–Koshland kinetics

Abstract: Motivation: Network inference approaches are widely used to shed light on regulatory interplay between molecular players such as genes and proteins. Biochemical processes underlying networks of interest (e.g. gene regulatory or protein signalling networks) are generally nonlinear. In many settings, knowledge is available concerning relevant chemical kinetics. However, existing network inference methods for continuous data are typically rooted in convenient statistical formulations which do not exploit chemical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(), Oates et al . () and Oates and Mukherjee (). For time dynamic processes the causal interpretation of a structural equation model (or a directed acyclic graph) for cross‐sectional data may be problematic, and alternatives need to be considered (Aalen et al ., , , ; Røysland, ; Sokol and Hansen, 2014).…”
Section: Discussion On the Paper By Peters Bühlmann And Meinshausenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(), Oates et al . () and Oates and Mukherjee (). For time dynamic processes the causal interpretation of a structural equation model (or a directed acyclic graph) for cross‐sectional data may be problematic, and alternatives need to be considered (Aalen et al ., , , ; Røysland, ; Sokol and Hansen, 2014).…”
Section: Discussion On the Paper By Peters Bühlmann And Meinshausenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large-scale network inference with nonlinear forward models, in particular, has seen relatively limited attention [6]. A notable effort from Oates et al [17] applies Bayesian model selection to ODE models systematically generated from potential species interactions, using reversible-jump MCMC (a general across-model sampling method) to simultaneously sample network topologies and their underlying rate parameters. Their approach employs standard methods for nested models: when adding reactions, the prior distribution is used to propose new reaction rates, and when swapping reactions, previous rate parameter values are simply retained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%