2018
DOI: 10.1042/ebc20180019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing phosphorylation signalling networks from quantitative phosphoproteomic data

Abstract: Cascades of phosphorylation between protein kinases comprise a core mechanism in the integration and propagation of intracellular signals. Although we have accumulated a wealth of knowledge around some such pathways, this is subject to study biases and much remains to be uncovered. Phosphoproteomics, the identification and quantification of phosphorylated proteins on a proteomic scale, provides a high-throughput means of interrogating the state of intracellular phosphorylation, both at the pathway leve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kinase-kinase and other kinase-substrate relationships have also been annotated in databases such as PhosphoSitePlus and Phospho.ELM (Dinkel et al, 2011;Hornbeck et al, 2015). However, bias in the study of kinase regulatory relationships has left the majority of the kinase-kinase interaction space largely unexplored (Invergo and Beltrao, 2018). Similar biases have been reported for protein-protein interaction databases (Gillis, Ballouz, and Pavlidis, 2014) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kinase-kinase and other kinase-substrate relationships have also been annotated in databases such as PhosphoSitePlus and Phospho.ELM (Dinkel et al, 2011;Hornbeck et al, 2015). However, bias in the study of kinase regulatory relationships has left the majority of the kinase-kinase interaction space largely unexplored (Invergo and Beltrao, 2018). Similar biases have been reported for protein-protein interaction databases (Gillis, Ballouz, and Pavlidis, 2014) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Because we set out to overcome the study bias inherent to signaling pathway annotations, we checked for relationships between kinase connectivity on the high-confidence network and kinase publication counts (Figure 4f; kinase publication counts were retrieved from Invergo and Beltrao (2018)). Interactions between kinases in the top three publicationcount deciles (more than 95 publications) accounted for only 31% of the network.…”
Section: Predicting a Global Network Of Kinase Regulatory Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depending on the cancer type, several kinases may act either as an oncogene or a tumor suppressor (An & Brognard, 2019), demonstrating the intricacies of kinase regulation and their role in defining cell phenotypes. Despite kinases being excellent targets for drug intervention (Bhullar et al, 2018), the majority of them, including the Fes kinase, are understudied (Invergo & Beltrao, 2018), thus making it difficult to link their function with cell phenotype. Here we have applied an unbiased phosphoproteomic and data-driven strategy to shed light on the contrasting oncogenic and tumor suppressor function of the understudied Fes kinase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We point out that the analysis of the SIGNOR PPI network already found biological applications reported by Sacco et al, 2016;Lun.X-K. et al, 2017;Kanhaiya et al, 2017;Dimitrakopoulos et al, 2018. The detailed review of various applications of the PPI signaling networks is given by Invergo and Beltrao, 2018. However, the Google matrix analysis has not been used in these studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%