The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2020.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network Impact of Social Innovation Initiatives in Marginalised Rural Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In two out of nine cases, the effects of the SI initiatives have become visible even if the initiatives are quite recent, and in one case, the impacts are expected in the future, thus providing directions for planning and policy making. These empirical data are consistent with studies showing that promoting SI in rural and marginalized areas is important, as it has positive effects mainly on the society, economy, and governance (e.g., [17,19,58,76,[82][83][84][85][86][87][88]). By taking the forms of social cooperatives, associations, social enterprises and private-public partnerships, SI proposes innovative solutions, models, services and approaches that tackle different complex social issues (e.g., labor market integration, social exclusion and poverty, discrimination, social service delivery, and disproportionate resource uses).…”
Section: Positive and Negative Effects Of Si Iinitiativessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In two out of nine cases, the effects of the SI initiatives have become visible even if the initiatives are quite recent, and in one case, the impacts are expected in the future, thus providing directions for planning and policy making. These empirical data are consistent with studies showing that promoting SI in rural and marginalized areas is important, as it has positive effects mainly on the society, economy, and governance (e.g., [17,19,58,76,[82][83][84][85][86][87][88]). By taking the forms of social cooperatives, associations, social enterprises and private-public partnerships, SI proposes innovative solutions, models, services and approaches that tackle different complex social issues (e.g., labor market integration, social exclusion and poverty, discrimination, social service delivery, and disproportionate resource uses).…”
Section: Positive and Negative Effects Of Si Iinitiativessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This led to an increase in the number of users of social networking services (SNSs), who are commonly called actors [1][2][3]. Currently, SNSs are expanding their functional characteristics and are used by actors for group interaction based on common interests, self-education, coordination in real life and doing business [4][5][6][7]. However, the communicative advantages of SNSs are used by malicious users to achieve unilateral advantages in the information space, and later-on the international geopolitical arena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity involved in SI initiatives, arising from the multi-agent collaboration (e.g., non-profit organizations, municipalities, private firms, training institutions), and the multi-faceted nature of benefits which may be created by these activities (most of which are immaterial), poses a relevant challenge for the evaluation of the outcomes and, consequently, for grasping the whole relevance in terms of impacts for the whole society. It is worth mentioning that SI initiatives are highly dependent on intangible assets, typically included in the concept of social capital, as shared values, perceptions, expectations, trust, reciprocity [24][25][26][27], which deserves some form of representation (e.g., by means of evaluation), in order to exert a positive effect on the internal cohesion and external engagement (i.e., civil society).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%