2014
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network biogeographical analysis of the central Aegean archipelago

Abstract: Aim Although the factors shaping plant species richness patterns across the islands of the central Aegean are well known, the processes driving the assembly of these island communities remain unclear. To shed light on these processes, we identified biogeographical modules within the phytogeographical area of the Cyclades and tested for nestedness across the islands. Location The Cyclades, Greece. Methods We used a network approach to detect island biogeographical roles and modules, based on a large and detaile… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated divergence of this clade from the rest of the Aegean lineages occurred 4.85 Mya, which suggested that the Naxos population might possess more relict characters than the Bythinella populations on the geographically close Attica, and Andros and Evvoia. No close relationships were found among the Bythinella from Naxos, Andros and Tinos, as was found for Pseudamnicola (Szarowska et al, 2015), despite the relatively recent connection of all these islands (Kougioumoutzis et al, 2014). Moreover, our Bythinella on Naxos was distinct from all other clades and perhaps reflected the same factors that caused Naxos to be one of the centres of diversity for plants (Kougioumoutzis et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The estimated divergence of this clade from the rest of the Aegean lineages occurred 4.85 Mya, which suggested that the Naxos population might possess more relict characters than the Bythinella populations on the geographically close Attica, and Andros and Evvoia. No close relationships were found among the Bythinella from Naxos, Andros and Tinos, as was found for Pseudamnicola (Szarowska et al, 2015), despite the relatively recent connection of all these islands (Kougioumoutzis et al, 2014). Moreover, our Bythinella on Naxos was distinct from all other clades and perhaps reflected the same factors that caused Naxos to be one of the centres of diversity for plants (Kougioumoutzis et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…No close relationships were found among the Bythinella from Naxos, Andros and Tinos, as was found for Pseudamnicola (Szarowska et al, 2015), despite the relatively recent connection of all these islands (Kougioumoutzis et al, 2014). Moreover, our Bythinella on Naxos was distinct from all other clades and perhaps reflected the same factors that caused Naxos to be one of the centres of diversity for plants (Kougioumoutzis et al, 2014). In general, the pattern of interpopulation diversity in Bythinella apparently reflected geological history, particularly the earlier events, much more than that in Pseudamnicola.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations