2013
DOI: 10.4161/sysb.26474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network as biomarker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 82 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Networks offer an interesting opportunity with regard to the study of markers: they allow to establish their relevance as individual entities and also as components of a cluster or module. Supported by recent literature (Dao et al, 2011 ; Peer and Hacohen, 2011 ; Bebek et al, 2012 ; Wu et al, 2012 ; Ben-Hamo and Efroni, 2013 ), we hypothesize that by switching their role, from individual to team players, markers may provide novel information on cancer, especially when studied in a pathway context. In particular, markers examined at a network scale may reveal their systems relationships, generating synergistically active candidates.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Networks offer an interesting opportunity with regard to the study of markers: they allow to establish their relevance as individual entities and also as components of a cluster or module. Supported by recent literature (Dao et al, 2011 ; Peer and Hacohen, 2011 ; Bebek et al, 2012 ; Wu et al, 2012 ; Ben-Hamo and Efroni, 2013 ), we hypothesize that by switching their role, from individual to team players, markers may provide novel information on cancer, especially when studied in a pathway context. In particular, markers examined at a network scale may reveal their systems relationships, generating synergistically active candidates.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%