2014
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble inference by integrative cancer networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At a methodological level, integrative cancer inference from networks is becoming increasingly popular [ 39 - 46 ], and advances in computational and visualization tools [ 45 ] make it feasible (no need of a model) and effective (ability to establish relationships). In our case, the data diversity in terms of experimental sources and conditions are not preventing both maps and charts to be displayed, thus driving our inference approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a methodological level, integrative cancer inference from networks is becoming increasingly popular [ 39 - 46 ], and advances in computational and visualization tools [ 45 ] make it feasible (no need of a model) and effective (ability to establish relationships). In our case, the data diversity in terms of experimental sources and conditions are not preventing both maps and charts to be displayed, thus driving our inference approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We briefly summarize the data generation aspects relevant to the novel developments, and refer the readers for further details on HOS and RB treatments to our previous work (10,11). Here, we embrace networks for inference purposes, and following known techniques (12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…could help determining function diversity. Notably, cancer synergism is a crucial factor that would imply the possibility for some complex relationships to be pinpointed by targeting marker ensembles, such as complexes or modules, rather than at individual ones, 69 such as single genes or proteins. This difference may be particularly true with multiple cancers, despite the hallmark of cancer heterogeneity suggests to consider the distinct characteristics of each cancer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%