2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13073-016-0288-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NetMHCpan-3.0; improved prediction of binding to MHC class I molecules integrating information from multiple receptor and peptide length datasets

Abstract: BackgroundBinding of peptides to MHC class I molecules (MHC-I) is essential for antigen presentation to cytotoxic T-cells.ResultsHere, we demonstrate how a simple alignment step allowing insertions and deletions in a pan-specific MHC-I binding machine-learning model enables combining information across both multiple MHC molecules and peptide lengths. This pan-allele/pan-length algorithm significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, and captures differences in the length profile of binders to different MH… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
462
1
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 479 publications
(482 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
9
462
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is trained on an extensive set of close to 140 000 MHC-peptide binding values covering 158 MHC molecules, including 13 bovine MHC class I (BoLA-I) alleles, and allows for prediction of peptides capable of binding to any MHC class I molecule of known protein sequence. NetMHCpan version 2.9 [30] was used rather than the recently updated version 3.0 [54], as the former was trained on an extended set of BoLA-I binding data that are not available in the public-domain data used to train version 3.0.…”
Section: Epitope Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is trained on an extensive set of close to 140 000 MHC-peptide binding values covering 158 MHC molecules, including 13 bovine MHC class I (BoLA-I) alleles, and allows for prediction of peptides capable of binding to any MHC class I molecule of known protein sequence. NetMHCpan version 2.9 [30] was used rather than the recently updated version 3.0 [54], as the former was trained on an extended set of BoLA-I binding data that are not available in the public-domain data used to train version 3.0.…”
Section: Epitope Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, great efforts have been paid to develop the algorithms to accurately predict the binding affinity, several software or website-based tools have been developed now. These methods mainly fall into two categories: MHC-specific, which a method is applied to individual MHC molecule, such as NetMHC [22], SMM [23], SYFPEITHI [24]; and pan-specific, which a single method is applied to nearly all MHC-I molecules, such as NetMHCpan [25] and NetMHCcons [26]. In particular, the pan-specific method is very powerful tool, considering the huge polymorphism of MHC genes [27].…”
Section: Next Generation Sequencing Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion is based on the fact that the K d values of most TCR ternary complexes are in the low-affinity range of ;0.1-500 mM (7). The six charged residues also hamper the interaction of 256 ILD with TCR because a hallmark of immunogenic CD8+ T cell epitopes is reportedly the possession of central, bulky, and hydrophobic (including aromatic) residues (51,52 , we retrospectively predicted T cell responses to the 12 oligopeptides using 11 publicly available residue-based methods (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) and compared these predictions with those obtained with SE FF12MC using the robust Z score standardization protocol to minimize the influence of outliers (43). In this study, the immunogenicity predictions with the 11 residue-based methods used a reported assumption that both the affinity and stability of an oligopeptide × HLA complex are a correlate of immunogenicity (17).…”
Section: Immunohorizons Mhc Groove Contraction Linked To the Lack Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One category comprises residue-based (or sequence-based) methods (such as those reported in Refs. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. These methods predict the HLA-complexation affinity or stability of a peptide with coarse granularity at the residue level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%