Netizens’ Political Engagement in Malaysia: Impact of Anti Fake News Act 2018

Abstract

The 14th Malaysia General Elections (GE14) in 2018 witnessed a historic victory for the opposition party led by Tun Mahathir Mohamed against the 60 years government holding party; BN coalition. Concurrently, it also witnessed social media tools; WhatsApp and Facebook as the most dominant and effective messaging tools, but also a source of fake and unverified news; followed by blogs and other sources. Prior to the election, the Anti-Fake News Act 2018 had been enforced in April 2018 where any creation, offering, publishing, distribution or dissemination of fake news is a crime. This research explores the effect of Anti-Fake News Act 2018 on netizens' political engagement through Facebook and Whatsapp during the 14th Malaysia General Election 2018 with impulsivity and habitual conduct as moderators. Data has been collected from 556 participants through online survey based on a framework integrating Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and Self Control Theory (SCT). Limited studies have tested the integration of TPB and SCT on knowledge about Anti-Fake News Act 2018 and political engagement. The findings of the study explain the influence of knowledge, impulsivity and habitual conduct on political engagement among Malaysian netizens through Facebook and Whatsapp during the GE14. Political engagement intensity has changed consequently after the Anti-Fake News Act 2018’s enforcement due to impulsivity. This study further adds to the literature in the area of online political participation and cyber law; uncovering the role of impulsivity and habitual conduct on netizens’ political engagement, suggesting the basis for future research in this phenomenon.

Delivery structure of nationalism message on Twitter in the context of Indonesian netizens

“…Netizens' demand for popular science (L. Wang and Zhong 2019), netizens' participation to support the government in times of crisis (J. Guo et al, 2018), netizens' digital activism in Zimbabwe (Nyoka and Tembo 2022), and netizens engagement patterns (Hasfi et al 2021;Seman et al 2019) are several studies that have been conducted to examine netizens' influence in each of the nations researched.…”

Media Information, Flood Images, and Perceptions in Times of Flood

“…When faced with a tragedy, the situation can become chaotic as a result of disasters that strike without warning. While disaster management agencies attempt to respond to the disaster by delivering aid to the victims, some individuals may attempt to exploit the situation by spreading false information [9], as seen during the African Ebola outbreak, Fukushima nuclear disaster, Kerala floods, and fires in the Amazon [10]. Notably, the information provided was derived from a tumultuous situation [11], which was inaccurate due to the lack of understanding in disaster management [12].…”

“…Notably, the information provided was derived from a tumultuous situation [11], which was inaccurate due to the lack of understanding in disaster management [12]. As a result of this information, netizens become angry with the government [9] and, particularly, disaster management agencies. When information about the delay in bringing relief was circulated on social media, one of the things that sparked popular outrage was that it seemed to show that the government was unprepared; nevertheless, what actually occurred is yet to be determined.…”