2016
DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20151115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Net energy and ractopamine levels for barrows weighing 70 to 100kg

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate net energy and dietary ractopamine levels for barrows weighing 70 to 100kg. The 150 pigs investigated (initial weight 70.80±3.84kg) were distributed in a randomized block design with a 5×3 factorial arrangement, comprising five levels of net energy (2,300; 2,425; 2,550; 2,675; and 2,800Kcal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feed intake is directly proportional to the energy level of the diets (GONÇALVES et al, 2016); therefore, it was speculated that a diet with energy restriction would promote an increase in feed consumption. However, this was not observed in this study, probably because the animals were able to meet their daily energy requirements without the need to increase their daily feed intake, even with the lower energy density diet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feed intake is directly proportional to the energy level of the diets (GONÇALVES et al, 2016); therefore, it was speculated that a diet with energy restriction would promote an increase in feed consumption. However, this was not observed in this study, probably because the animals were able to meet their daily energy requirements without the need to increase their daily feed intake, even with the lower energy density diet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed effects of the treatments on the average daily intake of digestible lysine, net energy, and crude protein were consistent with the responses observed for the average daily feed intake, in which the treatments with lower feed ingestion also resulted in lower nutrient consumption. It is still possible to infer that, even with the reduction of 188 kcal of net energy in the diet with qualitative restriction, the pigs adjusted their daily feed intake according to their energy requirements, a fact proven in studies such as that of GONÇALVES et al (2016), and thus were able to maintaina nutrient intake similar to that of the control group. Even with the reduction in nutrient intake, these treatments did not show a substantial reduction in weight gain; therefore, it is possible to infer that these treatments showed better feed efficiency, as did the animals fed the diet containing ractopamine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%