2013
DOI: 10.1179/2046905513y.0000000085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting 16S rDNA for bacterial identification in empyema

Abstract: 16S rDNA PCR improves rates of detection of bacteria in pleural fluid, and can detect bacterial species in a single assay as well as identifying unusual and unexpected causal agents.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that the multiplex PCR had a better sensitivity and specificity than conventional methods if the analysis is restricted to microorganisms included on the panel. Indeed, when using the clinical final diagnosis of empyema as a reference, the multiplex PCR-based assay had sensitivity six-times higher than that of the (34) No pathological finding 24 (33) Non-purulent secretion 23 (32) Erythema of the mucosa 20 (27) Purulent secretion 17 (23) Endobronchial tumour 8 (11) Bloody secretion 5 (7) conventional microbiologic methods. However, only a minority of the samples and a small percentage of the pathogens diagnosed by conventional methods were included in this panel including bacteria commonly involved in pneumonia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that the multiplex PCR had a better sensitivity and specificity than conventional methods if the analysis is restricted to microorganisms included on the panel. Indeed, when using the clinical final diagnosis of empyema as a reference, the multiplex PCR-based assay had sensitivity six-times higher than that of the (34) No pathological finding 24 (33) Non-purulent secretion 23 (32) Erythema of the mucosa 20 (27) Purulent secretion 17 (23) Endobronchial tumour 8 (11) Bloody secretion 5 (7) conventional microbiologic methods. However, only a minority of the samples and a small percentage of the pathogens diagnosed by conventional methods were included in this panel including bacteria commonly involved in pneumonia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, multiplex PCR methods in different matrices (blood, sputum, throat or nasopharyngeal swabs) have proven to be useful in diagnosing respiratory tract infections and decreasing the financial costs [8]. They have also shown a better sensitivity [9,10], especially in children [11,12]. They also seem to be effective for reducing the incidence of empyema [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empyema pleural fluids contain excess microbial pathogens and bacterial DNA [12,13]. TLR9 acts as a sensor for bacterial DNA which has abundant un-methylated CpG-nucleotides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of CpG-DNA as an anti-inflammatory and anti-infectious immunomodulator and as an adjuvant in immunotherapy has been widely-explored [9,10,11]. Empyema pleural fluids contain high bacterial load and bacterial DNA [12,13] thus during empyema PMCs are constantly exposed to bacterial pathogens and their DNA. However, what impact these will have on PMCs in MRSA empyema is still unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ein Empyem ist wahrscheinlich, wenn der pH < 7,0, die Glukose < 40 mg/dl und die LDH > 1,000 IU/l gemessen wird. Die Durchführung einer 16s-rDNA-Untersuchung auf bakterielles Genom mit anschließender Sequenzierung erhöht bei vorbehandelten Patienten die Nachweisrate [128,129]. Eine Zelldifferenzierung des Pleurapunktates (weißes Differenzialblutbild im Ausstrich) kann zu mykobakteriellen Erregern (typischerweise Lymphozytose) und Malignomen (Zellmorphologie) abgrenzen.…”
Section: Lokale Komplikationenunclassified