2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nerve Transfer to the Triceps After Brachial Plexus Injury: Report of Four Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is particularly relevant to determine which wrist muscles are functional in brachial plexus injuries and spinal cord lesion in the following situations: the need to correctly identify the roots involved in partial brachial plexus trauma; radial wrist extensors are paralyzed in extended upper-type lesions, whereas the ECU is consistently preserved; meanwhile, the FCR is consistently paralyzed in upper-type lesions affecting C5-C7, whereas the FCU is functional; and the PL is consistently innervated by the T1 root and preserved in C5-C8 root injuries; a few patients have wrist extension produced by finger extension; however, when grasping objects, their fingers do not extend further and their wrist drops, leading to decreased grip strength; such patients warrant a tendon or nerve transfer to strengthen their ECRB; when the FCU is being considered as an axon donor for reinnervation of the biceps [20], the anterior interosseous nerve [21], or the triceps [22]; when the FCU is being considered as a standard tendon transfer for thumb and finger extension [23]; before harvesting the FCU, PL integrity should be demonstrated, as the FCR is routinely paralyzed in extended upper-type lesions of the brachial plexus; in the absence of a strong FCU, wrist extension should be reconstructed by transferring the pronator quadratus motor branch to the ECRB motor branch [5], or to a free gracilis; we do not recommend transferring the flexor digitorum superficialis motor nerves to wrist extensors in extended brachial plexus palsy cases [24]; in lower-type injuries of the brachial plexus or in spinal cord injuries, the ECRL tendon is used to reconstruct finger flexion; before removing the ECRL, ECRB function must be demonstrated in order to preserve wrist extension [25]; also, a distal terminal branch of the nerve to the ECRB can be used to reinnervate the flexor pollicis longus or the anterior interosseous nerve [26,27]; in lower-type injuries of the brachial plexus and in midcervical spinal cord trauma, the nerve to the supinator muscle can be transferred to the posterior interosseous nerve to reconstruct thumb and finger extension; however, assessment of supinator muscle function is difficult. The nerve to the supinator shares the same spinal cord level innervation as the ECRB; consequently, if the ECRB is functional, the nerve to the supinator should also be preserved [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is particularly relevant to determine which wrist muscles are functional in brachial plexus injuries and spinal cord lesion in the following situations: the need to correctly identify the roots involved in partial brachial plexus trauma; radial wrist extensors are paralyzed in extended upper-type lesions, whereas the ECU is consistently preserved; meanwhile, the FCR is consistently paralyzed in upper-type lesions affecting C5-C7, whereas the FCU is functional; and the PL is consistently innervated by the T1 root and preserved in C5-C8 root injuries; a few patients have wrist extension produced by finger extension; however, when grasping objects, their fingers do not extend further and their wrist drops, leading to decreased grip strength; such patients warrant a tendon or nerve transfer to strengthen their ECRB; when the FCU is being considered as an axon donor for reinnervation of the biceps [20], the anterior interosseous nerve [21], or the triceps [22]; when the FCU is being considered as a standard tendon transfer for thumb and finger extension [23]; before harvesting the FCU, PL integrity should be demonstrated, as the FCR is routinely paralyzed in extended upper-type lesions of the brachial plexus; in the absence of a strong FCU, wrist extension should be reconstructed by transferring the pronator quadratus motor branch to the ECRB motor branch [5], or to a free gracilis; we do not recommend transferring the flexor digitorum superficialis motor nerves to wrist extensors in extended brachial plexus palsy cases [24]; in lower-type injuries of the brachial plexus or in spinal cord injuries, the ECRL tendon is used to reconstruct finger flexion; before removing the ECRL, ECRB function must be demonstrated in order to preserve wrist extension [25]; also, a distal terminal branch of the nerve to the ECRB can be used to reinnervate the flexor pollicis longus or the anterior interosseous nerve [26,27]; in lower-type injuries of the brachial plexus and in midcervical spinal cord trauma, the nerve to the supinator muscle can be transferred to the posterior interosseous nerve to reconstruct thumb and finger extension; however, assessment of supinator muscle function is difficult. The nerve to the supinator shares the same spinal cord level innervation as the ECRB; consequently, if the ECRB is functional, the nerve to the supinator should also be preserved [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quando o coto distal não está presente, tem-se como alternativa o implante do nervo diretamente no músculo (neurotização intramuscular). [4][5][6] Quando acontece perda dos movimentos do ombro e flexão do cotovelo, trata-se de uma lesão das raízes C5 e C6; se há perda dos movimentos de extensão do punho e dos dedos, a raiz C7 também está afetada. Quando não existe movimento tampouco dos flexores dos dedos e punho, constitui paralisia completa, ou seja, as raízes C8 e T1 também foram afetadas.…”
Section: Atualizaçãounclassified
“…When antagonistic nerves have been used, the learning process is more difficult and the patient may require additional time to understand how to activate the injured muscles. [20] The process of re-adaptation is still unclear, but a certain grade of brain plasticity is involved in learning how to utilize a muscle that is now supplied by a different motor nerve. [21][22][23][24]…”
Section: General Concepts In Nerve Transfersmentioning
confidence: 99%