1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3782(97)90556-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neonatal cranial ultrasound abnormalities in low birth weight infants: relation to cognitive outcomes at six years of age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
0
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
91
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…1 A total of 520 neonates r32 weeks in GA were admitted over the 2 1 2 years study period ( Figure 1) F overall, 41 had no HUS (16 died before a scan was done), 379 had normal (or only minor abnormality) studies, and 100 (21% of all those scanned) had major HUS abnormalities detected (Table 1), comparable to previous reports. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] We excluded from further analysis the 41 babies having no HUS study, the 198 having only one study, and 40 infants who had two studies, but less than 7 days apart (the 20 normal infants from this group had no repeat scans). Of the remaining 241 infants who had two or more scans, with the first two Z7 days apart, 43 were abnormal on the first or second study, with six of these reverting to normal on a third scan.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 A total of 520 neonates r32 weeks in GA were admitted over the 2 1 2 years study period ( Figure 1) F overall, 41 had no HUS (16 died before a scan was done), 379 had normal (or only minor abnormality) studies, and 100 (21% of all those scanned) had major HUS abnormalities detected (Table 1), comparable to previous reports. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] We excluded from further analysis the 41 babies having no HUS study, the 198 having only one study, and 40 infants who had two studies, but less than 7 days apart (the 20 normal infants from this group had no repeat scans). Of the remaining 241 infants who had two or more scans, with the first two Z7 days apart, 43 were abnormal on the first or second study, with six of these reverting to normal on a third scan.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4]25 The significance of mild and transient HUS abnormalities is less clear, however, and more subtle neurodevelopmental sequelae may only be recognized after longterm follow-up studies have been evaluated. 30 Indeed, extremely low-BW infants <25 weeks gestation are at the highest risk for developmental delay, even in the absence of abnormal intracranial pathology.…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both genetic and environmental factors are thought to be important, but the exact role of each has not yet been identified (1). Epigenetic events that increase the risk of developing tic disorder or TS include perinatal hypoxic-ischemic events that damage the periventricular germinal matrix and adjacent deep regions of the brain (2). A considerable amount of data implicates the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuit in TS pathophysiology, particularly basal ganglia (BG) abnormalities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the long-term neurodevelopmental consequences of preterm birth are thought to result from perinatal insults to the brain, typically affecting the periventricular white matter (Roth et al 1993, Whitaker et al 1996, Pinto-Martin et al 1999, Vollmer et al 2003.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%