2003
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serial Head Ultrasound Studies in Preterm Infants: How Many Normal Studies Does One Infant Need to Exclude Significant Abnormalities?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with previous reports. 21,22 In patients with spastic tetraplegia, periventricular leukomalacia, cerebral atrophy, and congenital brain anomalies were the most frequent abnormalities in the present study. In contrast to earlier reports, 5,8 congenital brain anomalies were detected in only 13.3% of patients with tetraplegic cerebral palsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This is in accordance with previous reports. 21,22 In patients with spastic tetraplegia, periventricular leukomalacia, cerebral atrophy, and congenital brain anomalies were the most frequent abnormalities in the present study. In contrast to earlier reports, 5,8 congenital brain anomalies were detected in only 13.3% of patients with tetraplegic cerebral palsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is likely that many of the infants enrolled in the other studies were not scanned for a sufficient length of time as a result of early discharge or because further scans were not deemed necessary because of initial normal US scan findings. [11][12][13][14] We have great concern about the recommendations given in two recent studies. One suggests that there is no need for further US scans when two normal US examinations, at least 7 days apart, have been obtained, in the absence of any further clinical deterioration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…22,23 However, if only one or two early or late cUS scans are performed, the detection of cystic PVL, the most predictive cUS marker for CP, is less reliable. 24 The infrequent scanning protocol recommended by the American Academy of Neurology is of concern. 25 In a excellent study by de Vries et al assessing cUS in high-risk preterm infants, highresolution, sequential cUS showed abnormalities in the majority (94%) of children having CP by 2 years.…”
Section: Predicting Neurodevelopmental Outcome From Cusmentioning
confidence: 99%