1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1988.tb10631.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neonatal Chlamydial Conjunctivitis

Abstract: Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) was isolated from eyes of 33 out of 160 infants with neonatal conjunctivitis. In nineteen (58%) of the infants with chlamydial conjunctivitis Ct could also be isolated from the nasopharynx. All infants were treated with oral erythromycin ethylsuccinate 25 mg/kg every 12 hours for 14 days combined with lid hygiene. All were clinically cured, and none had a relapse of clinical Ct conjunctivitis during an observation period of one year. However, one infant had persistent asymptomatic ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude that C trachomatis was a rare pathogen in neonatal conjunctivitis in a population-based setting, but respiratory viruses were detected more frequently than indicated earlier. Our findings suggest that it is important to be aware of the local aetiology of neonatal conjunctivitis, as causative agents vary between geographical locations and clinical settings (1)(2)(3)(4)6,(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). Even though systematic sampling in primary care for all possible pathogens appears to be unnecessary in our setting, routine sampling may still be needed in secondary and tertiary care units and in some geographical locations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conclude that C trachomatis was a rare pathogen in neonatal conjunctivitis in a population-based setting, but respiratory viruses were detected more frequently than indicated earlier. Our findings suggest that it is important to be aware of the local aetiology of neonatal conjunctivitis, as causative agents vary between geographical locations and clinical settings (1)(2)(3)(4)6,(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). Even though systematic sampling in primary care for all possible pathogens appears to be unnecessary in our setting, routine sampling may still be needed in secondary and tertiary care units and in some geographical locations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Chlamydia trachomatis (C trachomatis) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (N gonorrhoeae) are the most significant bacterial pathogens to be diagnosed in infectious neonatal conjunctivitis, because without treatment they can both lead to serious long-term consequences (8). C trachomatis is considered a major causative agent for neonatal conjunctivitis in many centres (9)(10)(11), but its proportion varies greatly between geographical regions and clinical settings, ranging from 0 to 64% (1)(2)(3)(4)6,(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). Respiratory viruses cause more than 10% of acute paediatric conjunctivitis (19), but their role during the neonatal period remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 9 nonrandomized studies, 8 collected data prospectively [ 4 , 15 , 27–30 , 32 , 33 ] and 1 collected data retrospectively [ 34 ]. Two of the studies used the same cohort of neonates but reported different outcomes [ 28 , 29 ]. Four studies were conducted in the United States [ 4 , 25 , 26 , 33 ], 4 in Sweden [ 28–31 ], 1 in Kenya [ 27 ], 1 in Mexico [ 32 ], and 2 in Hong Kong [ 15 , 34 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other outcomes, such as adverse effects, complications, and compliance, were likely not measured objectively or independently. Several studies were also at risk of bias as a result of their high percentage of loss to follow-up or lack of a statement regarding follow-up [ 25–27 , 29 , 31 ]. Overall, the risk of bias in the included studies was very serious because of their high loss to follow-up and lack of objective assessment of most outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation