2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00498.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoliberalism, policy localisation and idealised subjects: a case study on educational restructuring in England

Abstract: Abstract:Debate about neoliberalism has been a defining drama of twenty-first century geography.Appreciation of the contingent nature of neoliberalization has promoted interest in the localization of policy, and this paper furthers debate in three ways. Firstly, it highlights the importance of the peopling of the state and more specifically the importance of everyday public sector workers in the localized production of roll-out neoliberalization. Secondly, it illustrates the significance of these actors' ideas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In England, the empirical focus of this paper, the Labour government's time in office (1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) was characterised by a form of roll-out neoliberalism popularly summarised at the time as being about 'rights and responsibilities'. On the one hand, Labour sought to reform the welfare state by pursuing a workfare agenda, but on the other hand they acted to renew it by increasing state intervention in child and family policy as this was seen to promote social justice (Holloway and Pimlott-Wilson, 2012). This included a marked expansion of the state's role in parenting support as parents were envisaged as crucial actors in shaping children's current and future social in/exclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In England, the empirical focus of this paper, the Labour government's time in office (1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) was characterised by a form of roll-out neoliberalism popularly summarised at the time as being about 'rights and responsibilities'. On the one hand, Labour sought to reform the welfare state by pursuing a workfare agenda, but on the other hand they acted to renew it by increasing state intervention in child and family policy as this was seen to promote social justice (Holloway and Pimlott-Wilson, 2012). This included a marked expansion of the state's role in parenting support as parents were envisaged as crucial actors in shaping children's current and future social in/exclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the focus on the individual and his/her (usually his) disciplining of their selves has been criticized for ignoring the wider context in which children live, and the structural inequalities which shape those contexts (Clack 2012, 502, Gillies 2011. Individual responsibility, the production of a particular kind of subject, as emotionally self-responsible, is key in this model of well-being, a classic neoliberal framing (Holloway and Pimlott-Wilson 2012). Again using a Foucauldian analysis, Lemke makes a similar argument, citing Cruikshank (1996) with regard to the 'self esteem approach' in the United States.…”
Section: Social and Emotional Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working class children are also framed as gaining from their parent's employment in government rhetoric, reducing social exclusion as well as benefitting from spending time in 'professional' childcare away from their parents . In contrast, where parenting is judged positively (and thus conforms to idealised middle-class family norms), spending time away from parents is not seen to be in the best interests of children particularly when mothers' working hours are misaligned with children's schedules (Holloway and Pimlott-Wilson 2012).…”
Section: Gender In Labour Markets Government Policy and Austeritymentioning
confidence: 99%