Neoclassical Realism and the Underdevelopment of China’s Nuclear Doctrine

Abstract

of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Dangerous dyads in the post-Soviet space: explaining Russia's military escalation decisions, 1992–2010

“…On neoclassical realism, seeRose (1998);Lobell et al (2009);Ripsman et al (2016); Toje and Kunz (2012);Schweller (2004);Rosa (2018).33These data are consistent with the conclusion of MclaughlinMitchell and Prins (2004) that show that diversionary tactics operate only in situations of pre-existing rivalry (an opportunity-rich environment).…”

“… 32 On neoclassical realism, see Rose (1998); Lobell et al (2009); Ripsman et al (2016); Toje and Kunz (2012); Schweller (2004); Rosa (2018). …”

Eu-China Relations in an Evolving Multipolar International System: A Comparative Analysis of Neo-Classical Realism and Neo-Realism

“…These modes of interpretation, which reflect the neo-realist perception of the international system, can make it challenging to understand the relationship between the parties (Raymond and Kegley, 1990: 10). However, in recent years, there has been an increase in the number of publications examining the development of China's foreign policy from a neo-classical realist perspective (Sørensen, 2013;Rosa, 2018;Ye, 2019). These publications have provided guidance for making China's policies understandable with a different theoretical framework other than neo-realism.…”

China’s Nuclear Policy: A Realistic Assessment

“…These include solid fuels and underground tunnels, manufactured specially in response to the other nuclear-armed forces such as the United States. Furthermore, future planning involves improving the operational space system to ensure increased accuracy for long term projects (Rosa, 2018). The range of nuclear missiles is also drawn from conventional to modern methods so that advanced techniques of nuclear invasions can be pushed out of China's region with superior efforts.…”