2017
DOI: 10.3828/idpr.2016.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neo-customary land delivery systems and the rise of community-mediated settlements in peri-urban Enugu, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike Turok (2016) and scholars like Berrisford & McAuslan (2017) and Bartels (2019), who take a basically 'encroachment' approach to tenure-related conflict, Allen et al (2015) and Agheyisi (2019a), for example, espouse a more systematic approach characterised by pervading rural-urban flows and interactions for reciprocal benefits. By bringing together in sharp relief some contrasting and unequal attributes of urban and rural worldstenure systems, laws, institutions, and authorities -urbanisation interfaces with the urban land market to set the stage for the neocustomary tenure system (Onyebueke & Ikejiofor, 2017;Agheyisi, 2019aAgheyisi, , 2019b. In what Agheyisi (2019a, p. 532) described as "socio-cultural environment of urban land market and local power relations", local communities and other stakeholders, such as public planning agencies, and private developers, interact for mutual benefits and exchanges.…”
Section: Shifting Rural-urban Interface Urban Encroachment and Tenure-related Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike Turok (2016) and scholars like Berrisford & McAuslan (2017) and Bartels (2019), who take a basically 'encroachment' approach to tenure-related conflict, Allen et al (2015) and Agheyisi (2019a), for example, espouse a more systematic approach characterised by pervading rural-urban flows and interactions for reciprocal benefits. By bringing together in sharp relief some contrasting and unequal attributes of urban and rural worldstenure systems, laws, institutions, and authorities -urbanisation interfaces with the urban land market to set the stage for the neocustomary tenure system (Onyebueke & Ikejiofor, 2017;Agheyisi, 2019aAgheyisi, , 2019b. In what Agheyisi (2019a, p. 532) described as "socio-cultural environment of urban land market and local power relations", local communities and other stakeholders, such as public planning agencies, and private developers, interact for mutual benefits and exchanges.…”
Section: Shifting Rural-urban Interface Urban Encroachment and Tenure-related Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…while in others, they are juxtaposed with their statutory equivalents in form of legal pluralism (Otto & Hoekema, 2012;Berrisford & McAuslan, 2017;Bah, et al, 2018, p. 111). Possibly in most peri-urban contexts, they are witnessing a neo-customary turn -the increasingly adaption to land market pressures through community co-produced land subdivisions with assorted socio-economic and institutional transformations (Onyebueke & Ikejiofor, 2017;Chimhowu, 2019). According to Berrisford & McAuslan (2017):…”
Section: Shifting Rural-urban Interface Urban Encroachment and Tenure-related Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus in one of the cases in Enugu for which we undertook primary research, residents of a low income community (Ugbo Okonkwo) who were threatened with eviction for nonconformity with the Enugu masterplan, were deemed ineligible for compensated displacement (involuntary resettlement) by the ECTDA (Enugu Capital Territory District Administration) due to their lack of CoO, despite characterising themselves as customary/ established land and property owners. This issue must be understood in a context where information regarding tenure is patchy, inaccessible and hard to secure (Onyebueke & Ikejiofor, 2017). Furthermore, CoOs are expensive, difficult to register and, as such, out of reach for many urban citizens and particularly for the poor.…”
Section: Information and The Governance Of Displacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most outstanding challenges facing urban planning today -mainly in, but not limited to, the Global South-is how to cope with rapid urbanisation, inequality, informality, and environmental degradation (Parnell, Pieterse and Watson, 2009;Watson and Odendaal, 2012;Song, 2016). In "informal cities" of Africa, planning norms and procedures, many of which are relics of colonial pasts, often run counter to the (informal) everyday city-building practices (Watson, 2009(Watson, , 2011Nielsen, 2015a, 2015b;Onyebueke and Ikejiofor, 2017). Informality or the "state of exception from the formal order of urbanisation" (Roy, 2005, p. 147) vis-à-vis informal livelihoods, settlements, and practices often conflicts with planning rationality thereby limiting both the capacities of planners and the effective reach of plans to tackle these affected urban challenges.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%