2008
DOI: 10.1021/bi702429m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NELF-E RRM Undergoes Major Structural Changes in Flexible Protein Regions on Target RNA Binding

Abstract: The E subunit of the human heterotetrameric negative transcription elongation factor (NELF-E) contains a canonical betaalphabetabetaalphabeta RNA recognition motif (RRM) that binds to a wide variety of RNA sequences. These induce very similar conformational changes in the RRM as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Although the RNA binding interface of a canonical RRM is mainly located at its beta-sheet surface, for NELF-E RRM large chemical shift perturbations are observed for residues in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple binding specificities are not uncommon for RNA binding proteins, although different binding sites are sometimes recognized by different binding domains. 43 For a single RNA binding domain, different binding specificities could be obtained through alternate conformations of the domain as observed for U2AF65, 44,45 or structural reorganization upon binding as for NELF-E. 46 In addition, changes in RNA structure have the potential to present a site differently to a binding protein. 47 How the flexibility of Bru binding is achieved is not known, and will likely require structural studies with the protein or domains bound to different substrates for a complete understanding.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple binding specificities are not uncommon for RNA binding proteins, although different binding sites are sometimes recognized by different binding domains. 43 For a single RNA binding domain, different binding specificities could be obtained through alternate conformations of the domain as observed for U2AF65, 44,45 or structural reorganization upon binding as for NELF-E. 46 In addition, changes in RNA structure have the potential to present a site differently to a binding protein. 47 How the flexibility of Bru binding is achieved is not known, and will likely require structural studies with the protein or domains bound to different substrates for a complete understanding.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 18 nucleotides of a nascent transcript are buried inside the elongation complex (Gu et al 1996;Andrecka et al 2008), leaving the remainder of the 5′ region exposed for contact with NELF. NELF-E appears to have little if any sequence specificity (Narita et al 2003;Rao et al 2008). In accordance with the lack of sequence specificity, analysis of sequences of 50 promoters with paused Pol II failed to identify a sequence that could be correlated with the location of the paused Pol II .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…NELF-E contains an RNA recognition motif (Yamaguchi et al 2002;Rao et al 2008). Mutations that impair the RNA binding activity of this subunit also impair the ability of the NELF complex to inhibit elongation in vitro (Yamaguchi et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative binding experiments suggest that NELF-E binds to the lower stem region of TAR RNA [12], [19]. In addition, NMR studies have solved the structure of the RRM domain of NELF-E [24], [25]. This work also used fluorescence equilibrium titrations to test its interaction to single and double stranded RNA fragments of the lower stem of TAR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%