2009
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyp221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighbourhood food environment and area deprivation: spatial accessibility to grocery stores selling fresh fruit and vegetables in urban and rural settings

Abstract: The results presented here suggest that the assumption of a universal 'deprivation amplification' hypothesis in studies of the neighbourhood food environment may be misguided. Associations between neighbourhood deprivation and grocery store accessibility vary by environmental setting. Theories and policies aimed at understanding and rectifying spatial inequalities in the distribution of neighbourhood exposures for poor diet need to be context specific.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

10
104
2
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
10
104
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed differences in distance to each outlet type NZDep New Zealand Deprivation Index from MB centres between more and less deprived areas were statistically significant and are consistent with findings of other NZ studies (Pearce et al 2007a(Pearce et al , 2008b) that found similar relationships between distance to fresh produce stores and fast food outlets and area deprivation. Such findings also coincide with findings in the United Kingdom (Smith et al 2010). These findings suggest that people who live and work in more deprived neighbourhoods in NZ are likely to experience a higher relative exposure to unhealthy outlets, which increases the likelihood of unhealthy food consumption.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The observed differences in distance to each outlet type NZDep New Zealand Deprivation Index from MB centres between more and less deprived areas were statistically significant and are consistent with findings of other NZ studies (Pearce et al 2007a(Pearce et al , 2008b) that found similar relationships between distance to fresh produce stores and fast food outlets and area deprivation. Such findings also coincide with findings in the United Kingdom (Smith et al 2010). These findings suggest that people who live and work in more deprived neighbourhoods in NZ are likely to experience a higher relative exposure to unhealthy outlets, which increases the likelihood of unhealthy food consumption.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This socio-economic disadvantage was mirrored with the lowest provision of 'Specialist' and 'Specialist traditional' outlets in the most deprived areas. Findings are in contrast to research from Glasgow (Cummins and Macintyre, 1999) and Scotland (Smith et al, 2010); this may be explained by access categorisation at the wider neighbourhood level in these studies.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Food availability (6) , accessibility of retail food stores (7,8) , overall grocery quality (9) and price (10) may influence whether individuals have predominantly healthy or unhealthy dietary patterns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%