2024
DOI: 10.1002/alz.13736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighborhood disadvantage reduces cognitive reserve independent of neuropathologic change

Boram Kim,
Isabel Yannatos,
Kaitlin Blam
et al.

Abstract: INTRODUCTIONIndividuals in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods exhibit increased risk for impaired cognitive function. Whether this association relates to the major dementia‐related neuropathologies is unknown.METHODSThis cross‐sectional study included 469 autopsy cases from 2011 to 2023. The relationships between neighborhood disadvantage measured by Area Deprivation Index (ADI) percentiles categorized into tertiles, cognition evaluated by the last Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores before … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the generalizability of these findings to more representative populations may be limited. For instance, in contrast to our findings, CR has been associated with lower neighborhood deprivation in cohorts with higher average levels of deprivation [ 41 ] and with higher educational attainment in cohorts with very low levels of education [ 84 ]. Finally, while we consider those in the Resilient subgroup to show CR to AD, we must acknowledge that many individuals in our sample had low levels of Aβ and tau at baseline and may not be on the AD continuum.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, the generalizability of these findings to more representative populations may be limited. For instance, in contrast to our findings, CR has been associated with lower neighborhood deprivation in cohorts with higher average levels of deprivation [ 41 ] and with higher educational attainment in cohorts with very low levels of education [ 84 ]. Finally, while we consider those in the Resilient subgroup to show CR to AD, we must acknowledge that many individuals in our sample had low levels of Aβ and tau at baseline and may not be on the AD continuum.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…National ADI values range from 1–100 and reflect national percentiles of neighborhood disadvantage with lower values reflect lower level of disadvantage within the nation. We categorized ADI into tertiles (Lowest deprivation, intermediate deprivation, and highest deprivation) based on the distribution of national ADI values across the wider HABS cohort [ 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%