2015
DOI: 10.1093/sf/sov049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negotiating Migration, Performing Gender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theory itself leaves some room to accommodate a degree of intrafamily bargaining (e.g., see Stark & Bloom, ). Although ethnographic scholarship has consistently shown the contested, negotiated, and gendered nature of migration decision‐making (Grasmuck & Pessar, ; Hondagneu‐Sotelo, , ; Paul, ), these dimensions have been mostly missing in quantitative, population‐level research. Recent studies are exceptions where new economics of labour migration has played a smaller (Kanaiaupuni, ; Creighton & Riosmena, ) or larger (Nobles & McKelvey, ; Riosmena, ) role, but these studies consider intrafamily dynamics among spouses, not siblings.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory itself leaves some room to accommodate a degree of intrafamily bargaining (e.g., see Stark & Bloom, ). Although ethnographic scholarship has consistently shown the contested, negotiated, and gendered nature of migration decision‐making (Grasmuck & Pessar, ; Hondagneu‐Sotelo, , ; Paul, ), these dimensions have been mostly missing in quantitative, population‐level research. Recent studies are exceptions where new economics of labour migration has played a smaller (Kanaiaupuni, ; Creighton & Riosmena, ) or larger (Nobles & McKelvey, ; Riosmena, ) role, but these studies consider intrafamily dynamics among spouses, not siblings.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, they are also non-migrants because, even in their locally legible status as failed or former migrants, their experiences of the migration processes are incomplete and distinct from those who have worked or lived in foreign countries. Recent studies have considered those who choose to stay (Fioratta 2015;Reeves 2011) and those who are deciding or ambivalent about whether to migrate (Paul 2015). By emphasizing the ambiguous subjectivities of those who began to migrate yet eventually stayed, this article expands our understanding of the agency and category of non-migrants.…”
Section: Producing Redirecting and Multiplying Mobilities And Immobimentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, recipient and sending states discursively construct feminine domesticity to facilitate women's involvement in the international labor market as unprotected care providers (Chin 1998;Silvey 2004;Rodriguez 2002). While acknowledging that female migration breaks gender barriers, analysts emphasize the persistence of patriarchal norms: female migrants are confined to lowly paid reproductive labor (Parreñas 2001;Lan 2008), and their migration decisions are constrained by ideologies valorizing motherhood (Parreñas 2009;Paul 2015). Rather than exchanging housework for their wives' incomes and adopting egalitarian gender ideologies (Thebaud 2010), men who stay behind outsource childcare to extended female kin as a means to defend their masculinity (Parreñas 2009;Hoang, Yeoh & Wattie 2012).…”
Section: Female Migration and Masculinitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%