In between leaving and being left behind: mediating the mobilities and immobilities of Indonesian non‐migrants

Abstract

In this article, I consider how and why some non‐migrants partially inhabit migrant subjectivities. Based on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Central Java, Indonesia, I describe the experiences of those who embarked on pre‐departure migration processes, but failed to leave the country. Men were often victims of fraud; women typically ran away from the confines of training centres. When redirected away from the border spaces of airports and recruitment centres, they typically identify themselves and are perceived by kin and neighbours as ‘former’ transnational migrants. I analyse how migration infrastructure – intersecting institutions, agents and technologies – produces such subjectivities in‐between conventional migrant and non‐migrant categories. These positions in between leaving and staying illuminate the infrastructural conditions that enable, constrain and mediate transnational mobilities. These cases of non‐departure show the expansive social and spatial effects of migration infrastructure beyond the facilitation of transnational movement. Such less considered (im)mobilities of non‐migrants point to the diverse ways in which migration institutions and agents mediate the circulation of persons between and within national borders.

Migrant youth ‘between mobilities’: Sessility as a working concept

“…The technology‐driven world of late modernity, along with increased mobility, has already for some time permitted a number of people to physically stay ‘at home’ but to move virtually and be global in their reach, thanks to the internet. Similarly, some have argued that mobility and place‐attachment or belonging are not mutually exclusive (Andreotti, Le Galès, & Moreno Fuentes, 2013; Chan, 2017; Conlon, 2011; Gustafson, 2009). As Fallov et al.…”

‘Mapping Migrancies’: A discursive mapping approach to analyse lived experiences of skilled migration infrastructures

“…Studies under this realm have ranged from exploring border securitization processes (Dijstelbloem, 2017) to brokerage mechanisms (Faist, 2014). Literature on meso-level commercial actors includes explorations of informal or semi-formal migration brokerage (Alpes, 2017;Chan, 2017;Tuckett, 2018;Yeoh et al, 2017;Fernandez, 2013;Lindquist, 2017), formal intermediary services (Groutsis et al, 2015;Underhill et al, 2016;Harvey et al, 2018;Žabko et al, 2018;Koh & Wissink, 2018), international education systems (Thieme, 2017;Beech, 2018;Lim & Pham, 2016;Robertson, 2017;Liu & Lin, 2017), and transnational recruitment processes (Cranston, 2018;Cranston, 2016;Xiang, 2017;Friberg, 2016;McCollum & Findlay, 2018). However, while the maps in this paper confirm that commercial processes are a significant aspect of skilled migration, they also stress upon the interlinked social, technological, and regulatory processes that are occurring simultaneously, and being shaped, and (re)created by migrants' own thoughts and actions (Xiang & Lindquist, 2014).…”

‘The best of both worlds’: Lagos private schools as engaged strategists of transnational child-raising

“…By centring Lagos schools as sites of transnational child-raising, this paper not only addresses empirical gaps, but at a broader level responds to longstanding (Levitt and Glick Schiller, 2004) and recent (Chan, 2017) critiques of migration studies' tendency to focus on 'migrants' and cast all else as a backdrop of the 'left behind', rather than trace the way migration enrols diverse actors, institutions and spaces in imaginary and material networks. The paper continues as follows.…”