2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negatively charged tangential flow ultrafiltration membranes for whey protein concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
26
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
26
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Because many of micro‐ or ultra‐filtration processes in the literature target separations involving biofunctional molecules from proteinaceous environments, maintaining the original characteristics of the target protein in these cases is crucial. Therefore, relatively mild conditions consisting of dipolar or hydrolphilic membranes, detergents, or back pressure have been used to mitigate membrane fouling while preserving the characteristics of the target proteins . Our work employed a unique approach for preventing fouling in a special situation, i.e., concentrating living microorganisms in the presence of enzyme hydrolyzed egg whites where the target is the microorganism rather than a protein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because many of micro‐ or ultra‐filtration processes in the literature target separations involving biofunctional molecules from proteinaceous environments, maintaining the original characteristics of the target protein in these cases is crucial. Therefore, relatively mild conditions consisting of dipolar or hydrolphilic membranes, detergents, or back pressure have been used to mitigate membrane fouling while preserving the characteristics of the target proteins . Our work employed a unique approach for preventing fouling in a special situation, i.e., concentrating living microorganisms in the presence of enzyme hydrolyzed egg whites where the target is the microorganism rather than a protein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, relatively mild conditions consisting of dipolar or hydrolphilic membranes, detergents, or back pressure have been used to mitigate membrane fouling while preserving the characteristics of the target proteins. [17][18][19][20] Our work employed a unique approach for preventing fouling in a special situation, i.e., concentrating living microorganisms in the presence of enzyme hydrolyzed egg whites where the target is the microorganism rather than a protein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two types of solute‐retention behavior cover a broad range used in bioprocessing, across different modalities and even across different industries (biotechnology, ADCs, food and dairy processing). Some applications may require separation of a small molecule or protein from larger molecules using semi‐permeable ultrafiltration membranes, and some applications may require concentration of protein solutions using completely retentive ultrafiltration membranes . With the exploration of single pass TFF as a new technology as an alternative to TFF, it is important to understand the single‐pass ultrafiltration behavior of both partially retained and completely retained proteins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some applications may require separation of a small molecule or protein from larger molecules using semipermeable ultrafiltration membranes, 13,15,17,18 and some applications may require concentration of protein solutions using completely retentive ultrafiltration membranes. [5][6][7]19 With the exploration of single pass TFF as a new technology as an alternative to TFF, it is important to understand the single-pass ultrafiltration behavior of both partially retained and completely retained proteins. This is the first work to provide experimental data demonstrating the behavior of partially retained proteins and completely retained proteins as a function of membrane molecular weight cut-off.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the calculated sieving factor represents the apparent sieving factor that is based on the permeate concentration and mixing-cup concentration of the retentate 14. The samples collected at different DVs were analyzed for the concentration of each compound in both retentate solution and permeate solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%