2009
DOI: 10.1891/0889-8391.23.2.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative Self-Beliefs in Relation to Eating Disorder and Depressive Symptoms: Different Themes Are Characteristic of the Two Sets of Symptoms in Those With Eating Disorders and/or Depression

Abstract: This study aimed to identify differences in the personal themes in negative self or core beliefs that might be characteristic of high levels of eating disorder symptoms when compared to high levels of depressive symptoms in those with an eating disorder and/or depression. Differences between putative diagnostic subgroups were also examined. One hundred and ninety-three participants completed self-report measures of negative self-beliefs, eating, and depressive symptoms. Putative diagnostic subgroups were also … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Association between concepts that share a response key is inferred to be stronger the faster the subject performs the task. Two subversions of the task were used: The self‐esteem IAT included “me”/“other” words, and positive and negative personality word from Anderson; The self‐compassion IAT included “me”/”other” words, and positive and negative words from Cooper and Cowen “lack of warmth” dimension and from Goss and Gilbert descriptions of self‐criticism/self‐compassionate features. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Association between concepts that share a response key is inferred to be stronger the faster the subject performs the task. Two subversions of the task were used: The self‐esteem IAT included “me”/“other” words, and positive and negative personality word from Anderson; The self‐compassion IAT included “me”/”other” words, and positive and negative words from Cooper and Cowen “lack of warmth” dimension and from Goss and Gilbert descriptions of self‐criticism/self‐compassionate features. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research consistently shows that eating disorder risk is associated with the perception of ambiguous stimuli to be negatively related to one's appearance (Brockmeyer et al, 2018;Rodgers & DuBois, 2016) and self-worth (e.g., Cooper, 2005;Cooper & Cowen, 2009;Pringle, Harmer, & Cooper 2010). Research consistently shows that eating disorder risk is associated with the perception of ambiguous stimuli to be negatively related to one's appearance (Brockmeyer et al, 2018;Rodgers & DuBois, 2016) and self-worth (e.g., Cooper, 2005;Cooper & Cowen, 2009;Pringle, Harmer, & Cooper 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cognitive theories propose that the development and maintenance of various psychopathologies can be partially attributed to the tendency to preferentially process disorder-salient stimuli above all other information types, resulting in an interpretation bias. Research consistently shows that eating disorder risk is associated with the perception of ambiguous stimuli to be negatively related to one's appearance (Brockmeyer et al, 2018;Rodgers & DuBois, 2016) and self-worth (e.g., Cooper, 2005;Cooper & Cowen, 2009;Pringle, Harmer, & Cooper 2010). For instance, a friend stating they joined a gym would be interpreted by the person at risk as evidence that they too should exercise and improve their weight and shape (interpretation bias related to appearance), or that they are lazy for not doing so (interpretation bias related to self-worth), rather than considering a more adaptive resolution (e.g., a friend's pride in their new found motivation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fairburn et al 2003 ;Cooper et al 2004 ;Waller et al 2007a). Emerging evidence, however, suggests that the specific content of some of these beliefs may be different between the two disorders (Waller et al 2001 ;Cooper et al 2005 ;Cooper & Cowen, 2009). Emerging evidence, however, suggests that the specific content of some of these beliefs may be different between the two disorders (Waller et al 2001 ;Cooper et al 2005 ;Cooper & Cowen, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%