2018
DOI: 10.1002/eat.22938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new cognitive bias modification technique to influence risk factors for eating disorders

Abstract: The results support the usefulness of the CBM-I for appearance protocol, and suggests that this technique warrants further investigation with respect to modifying interpretation bias and risk factors associated with eating disorder psychopathology. Null effects of CBM-I for self-worth should be interpreted in light of study limitations, including the potential unsuitability of training material for young women. CBM-I for both types of interpretation bias should be evaluated in future research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results suggested that the CBM-I was more useful for increasing positive interpretations related to appearance than those related to self-worth (Matheson, Wade, & Yiend, 2018). These findings indicate that the IB may be specific to ED-related threats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results suggested that the CBM-I was more useful for increasing positive interpretations related to appearance than those related to self-worth (Matheson, Wade, & Yiend, 2018). These findings indicate that the IB may be specific to ED-related threats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Moreover, a recent cognitive bias modification for IB (CBM‐I) study compared two CBM‐I conditions, one focusing on appearance and the other focusing on self‐worth, in female students. The results suggested that the CBM‐I was more useful for increasing positive interpretations related to appearance than those related to self‐worth (Matheson, Wade, & Yiend, ). These findings indicate that the IB may be specific to ED‐related threats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adapted from Huppert et al, 2007;Hayes et al, 2010 Research team (4 individuals) independently chose subgroup of sentences with greatest potential of being interpreted in positive or negative way. Huppert et al, 2007;Hirsch et al, 2009;Hayes et al, 2010;Cardi et al, 2015Matheson et al, 2018 87 scenarios describing appearance-relevant ambiguous social scenarios…”
Section: Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, in the course of this task cognitive bias for what body type was perceived as normal shifted toward the body type that the participants had to focus on in the task. A study in university students adapted a cognitive bias modification protocol and found that body image focused attention bias modification was helpful to improve body satisfaction (Matheson, Wade, & Yiend, ). In those two latter studies participants were healthy and whether those processes can be successfully used in individuals with eating disorders remains to be studied. Werthmann, J., et al, Same, same but different: Attention bias for food cues in adults and adolescents with anorexia nervosa.…”
Section: Cognitive Biases and Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%