2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99951-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative enrichment of circulating tumor cells from unmanipulated whole blood with a 3D printed device

Abstract: Reliable and routine isolation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from peripheral blood would allow effective monitoring of the disease and guide the development of personalized treatments. Negative enrichment of CTCs by depleting normal blood cells ensures against a biased selection of a subpopulation and allows the assay to be applied on different tumor types. Here, we report an additively manufactured microfluidic device that can negatively enrich viable CTCs from clinically-relevant volumes of unmanipulated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…98,99 A key advantage of negative enrichment is that intact (label-free) CTCs are obtained independent of their specific antigen expression, and thus, a heterogenous population of CTCs can be isolated (i.e., including low-EpCAM-expressing CTCs). 100,101 This approach does not, however, afford a tumour-specific selection and thus typically results in a low purity (as exemplified by the low and inconsistent purities across different systems varying between 0.97-10%, going up to a maximum of 34.8 ± 14%). [102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111] 2.1.1 Applying antigen-dependent isolation in fully integrated platforms.…”
Section: Antigen-dependant Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…98,99 A key advantage of negative enrichment is that intact (label-free) CTCs are obtained independent of their specific antigen expression, and thus, a heterogenous population of CTCs can be isolated (i.e., including low-EpCAM-expressing CTCs). 100,101 This approach does not, however, afford a tumour-specific selection and thus typically results in a low purity (as exemplified by the low and inconsistent purities across different systems varying between 0.97-10%, going up to a maximum of 34.8 ± 14%). [102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111] 2.1.1 Applying antigen-dependent isolation in fully integrated platforms.…”
Section: Antigen-dependant Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, including low-EpCAM-expressing CTCs). 100,101 This approach does not, however, afford a tumour-specific selection and thus typically results in a low purity (as exemplified by the low and inconsistent purities across different systems varying between 0.97–10%, going up to a maximum of 34.8 ± 14%). 102–111…”
Section: Ctc Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, CTCs are described by phenotypical heterogeneity, with some CTCs failing the selection process due to a lack of marker expression [ 29 ]. In these conditions, negative selection methods could successfully isolate CTCs by identifying and excluding from analysis various non-malignant cells using antibodies recognizing cell surface markers expressed by these circulating blood cells [ 25 , 30 ]. In comparison, label-independent CTC enrichment methods subject CTCs to separation based on biophysical features such as density, size, deformability, electrical characteristics and invasiveness [ 31 ].…”
Section: Liquid Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%