2011
DOI: 10.1002/da.20854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative biases and risk for depression; integrating self-report and emotion task markers

Abstract: These results are consistent with seminal theories that a systematic cognitive negativity bias produces a hyper-reactivity to negative emotion, which can impact nonconscious as well as conscious processing. The results provide a step toward objective markers of risk for depression that would help the community act regarding preventative programs. Replication in patient samples is warranted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
3
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings may suggest differential awareness (DMN), salience (SN), and cognitive control (ECN) of mental states in MDD that may contribute to rumination or impaired planful action based on awareness of one's own mental states. Although the current study did not include measures of these constructs, this interpretation is consistent with prevailing cognitive theories of MDD (eg, Watters and Williams, 2011). Specific to the prediction of treatment response, connectivity between anterior insula and middle temporal gyrus may subserve attention to internal affective states and social comparisons that interacted with cognitive symptoms of MDD (eg, guilt, worthlessness).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These findings may suggest differential awareness (DMN), salience (SN), and cognitive control (ECN) of mental states in MDD that may contribute to rumination or impaired planful action based on awareness of one's own mental states. Although the current study did not include measures of these constructs, this interpretation is consistent with prevailing cognitive theories of MDD (eg, Watters and Williams, 2011). Specific to the prediction of treatment response, connectivity between anterior insula and middle temporal gyrus may subserve attention to internal affective states and social comparisons that interacted with cognitive symptoms of MDD (eg, guilt, worthlessness).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In addition, OCD patients reported experiencing unpleasant odors as subjectively more unpleasant and intense in relation to their increased anterior insula response, and they experienced pleasant odors as less pleasant (numerically), and less intense in the case of vanilla, than HC. It may be that, similar to patients with major depression (Watters and Williams, 2011), OCD patients have a negative cognitive bias and experience all stimuli, regardless of sensory domain, as being slightly more negative than HC, so even “pleasurable” stimuli are experienced as less pleasant (Jhung et al, 2010), although this hypothesis is speculative and requires further investigation. Patients’ increased insular reactivity to both pleasant and unpleasant odors might reflect their propensity to experience negative emotions, which might be a vulnerability factor for OCD (Schienle et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the inherent emotional and attentional biases associated with depression (Foland-Ross et al 2013;Watters and Williams 2011), this pattern of enhanced cortical activity appears specific to negatively valenced material in such patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%