2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-01428-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative affectivity, sensory processing hypersensitivity, sleep quality and dreams: A conceptual model for generalised anxiety disorder in adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together, these findings suggest that both positive and negative features of SPS may influence dream recall, and that the negative factors may be important in amplifying our reactions to negative dream content. Interestingly, Levin and Fireman (2001) linked nightmare recall frequency to both fantasy proneness and absorption, and Khodarahim et al (2023) showed that SPS moderated the link between negative affectivity and a latent variable reflecting both dream recall frequency and attitudes toward dreams. Specifically, negative affectivity predicted SPS, which predicted more frequent dream recall and a stronger tendency to regard dreams as meaningful—the latter variable possibly reflecting deeper processing of dream content.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, these findings suggest that both positive and negative features of SPS may influence dream recall, and that the negative factors may be important in amplifying our reactions to negative dream content. Interestingly, Levin and Fireman (2001) linked nightmare recall frequency to both fantasy proneness and absorption, and Khodarahim et al (2023) showed that SPS moderated the link between negative affectivity and a latent variable reflecting both dream recall frequency and attitudes toward dreams. Specifically, negative affectivity predicted SPS, which predicted more frequent dream recall and a stronger tendency to regard dreams as meaningful—the latter variable possibly reflecting deeper processing of dream content.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional MRI studies indicate that frontal brain areas (parts of the salience network and default mode network) play a major role in sensory processing sensitivity (Greven et al, 2019) and, thus, would be in line with the findings of Vallat et al (2020) that more intense processing during the awakening process can increase the chance to recall a dream. Neither of the two studies (Carr et al, 2021;Khodarahimi et al, 2021) reporting an association between sensory processing sensitivity and dream recall, however, controlled for possible mediating effects of personality variables like the big five factors. Nevertheless, these two findings indicate that traits that are conceptualized as neurophysiological (Aron et al, 2012) may be related to dream recall frequency and, thus, add a new pathway to the abovementioned psychological pathways (focusing on dreams can increase dream recall) explaining the interindividual differences in dream recall.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In a student sample, sensory processing sensitivity was related to dream recall frequency, with those having high and medium sensitivity reporting higher dream recall than those with low sensitivity (Carr et al, 2021). Another study (Khodarahimi et al, 2021) reported a positive relationship between sensory processing hypersensitivity and a composite dream recall measure including nightmare frequency, dream sharing frequency, and so on in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. High sensory processing sensitivity is characterized by increased depth of processing, awareness of subtleties, high emotional reactivity, and ease of overstimulation (Aron et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%