2018
DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1535127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negation and the N400: investigating temporal aspects of negation integration using semantic and world-knowledge violations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
51
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
14
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The classical N400 effect, which manifests in a larger negative amplitude for semantically incongruent sentences than for congruent sentences, reflects semantic processing 51 , 65 , 66 . This N400 effect has also been observed in response to sentences with world knowledge violations 47 50 , 67 69 . The amplitude of N400 is assumed to reflect the difficulty of integrating the coming word into the preceding context 52 54 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classical N400 effect, which manifests in a larger negative amplitude for semantically incongruent sentences than for congruent sentences, reflects semantic processing 51 , 65 , 66 . This N400 effect has also been observed in response to sentences with world knowledge violations 47 50 , 67 69 . The amplitude of N400 is assumed to reflect the difficulty of integrating the coming word into the preceding context 52 54 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Although the reading stimuli in the present study were written in Chinese, an ideographic language, this fact is not a limitation of the study. Specifically, previous studies have demonstrated that world knowledge violations can elicit an N400 effect relative to correct controls, not only in Chinese 48 , 68 but also in other languages using alphabets, such as English 49 , 69 , Dutch 50 , 74 and German 47 , 67 , 75 . These findings indicate that the difference between ideographic and alphabetic languages does not affect the neural processing of world knowledge integration in sentence comprehension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial activation process is thought to be automatic, governed by memory-based associative operations, and very similar to that involved in the processing of affirmative sentences (Deutsch et al, 2006, 2009). By contrast, more controlled, rule-based processes are thought to intervene in the second step, inducing a change of the initial representation (Deutsch et al, 2009; Dudschig et al, 2019). Therefore, dealing with two opposing representations—the negated and the actual state of affairs—seems to demand to some extent conflict monitoring and selection of alternatives, followed by suppression or inhibition of the initial alternative (Dudschig and Kaup, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most prior behavioral and ERP studies have mainly focused on detecting the representational states associated with negation by measuring indexes of semantic processing such as the N400 component in world-knowledge or semantic violation sentences (e.g., Fischler et al, 1983; Nieuwland and Kuperberg, 2008; Dudschig et al, 2018, 2019) or reaction times in probe recognition tasks (MacDonald and Just, 1989; Kaup, 2001; Kaup and Zwaan, 2003), neglecting the conflict monitoring and inhibition processes that underlie the two-step process dynamics. By contrast, the time–frequency analysis of the EEG in the context of the dual-task paradigm we employed here may reveal an early operation of the inhibitory control mechanism that governs the transition from the initial to the final representation of the negated events (Dudschig et al, 2019) or prevents the representation of the negated situation. Interesting issues for further research are the extent to which the early inhibitory control process is automatically activated by negation operators, and the role that pragmatics (e.g., the pre-activation of negated meaning by the preceding context) plays in the initiation of conflict monitoring and the inhibition processes associated with negation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of a negation operator in a sentence results in a substantial modification of the sentence meaning through a reversal of its truth-value. Despite its frequent use in natural language, the presence of a negative marker seems to elicit additional processing resources during sentence comprehension, resulting in increased reading and reaction times, decreased response accuracy and differential event-related potential (ERP) responses when compared to affirmative sentences (Clark and Chase, 1972; Carpenter and Just, 1975; Fischler et al, 1983; Hasson and Glucksberg, 2006; Kaup et al, 2007; Luedtke et al, 2008; Dale and Duran, 2011; Wiswede et al, 2013; Dudschig et al, 2019). As a consequence, at least when presented in isolation, negative sentences have been argued to constitute an exception to fully incremental language comprehension (Carpenter and Just, 1975; Fischler et al, 1983; Kaup et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%