“…Our experience as well is similar to that reported in literature [8], FNA, although it offers results similar to those with exfoliative cytology, is still not routinely used [4,11,21], The repetition of the examination in the case of negativity, though pos sible, presents inconveniences: although minimal, the method causes trauma to the patient. Finally, needle aspiration is never entirely free of complications [1,5,6,9], In light of the above, it is obvious that per cutaneous FNA cannot represent the first-line exam ination for the identification of the histological type of lung tumor [7], We must consider that where the bronchoscopic examination and exfoliative cytology are not able to give a reliable response, FNA remains an important diagnostic method [11,15,16], Con traindications to FNA are: chronic respiratory insuf ficiency, pulmonary arterial hypertension, impairment of coagulation, highly vascularized lesions, suspected echinococcosis and poor general conditions [12,20,24], This technique is not altogether new. The first experimenting was performed by Menetrier [19] in 1886, diagnosing a lung tumor with aspiration, carried out by means of a transthoracic cannula.…”