1995
DOI: 10.1108/09590559510103954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Need for uniqueness: shopping mall preference and choice activity

Abstract: Since the store mix and product offerings of many regional shopping malls are very similar, often the primary discriminator between many of these centres is merely location. Making the choice to shop at a regional shopping mall other than the one nearest to one′s place of residence, therefore, does not appear to be a logical choice in many instances. Such behaviour, however, appears to be relatively common. It would appear, therefore, that regional shopping mall choice may not always be based solely on the off… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(36 reference statements)
3
63
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This process consists of comparing the present state with some ideal state defined by the individual, dependent on the strength of his/her need for uniqueness. An individual's self-perceived degree of uniqueness is a reflection of how closely that individual perceives himself/herself to resemble others at the present time (Burns & Warren, 1995). Burns and Krampf (in Roehrich, 2002) observed that individuals with high needs for uniqueness were more apt to adopt new products than were individuals with low needs for uniqueness.…”
Section: Need For Uniquenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This process consists of comparing the present state with some ideal state defined by the individual, dependent on the strength of his/her need for uniqueness. An individual's self-perceived degree of uniqueness is a reflection of how closely that individual perceives himself/herself to resemble others at the present time (Burns & Warren, 1995). Burns and Krampf (in Roehrich, 2002) observed that individuals with high needs for uniqueness were more apt to adopt new products than were individuals with low needs for uniqueness.…”
Section: Need For Uniquenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, if individuals perceive themselves as having insufficient personal uniqueness, they will be prompted to pursue activities (such as buying fashionable clothes), which may have the potential to rectify this undesirable situation. Furthermore, individuals with stronger needs for uniqueness would be more likely to desire consumer choices which may be viewed as non-traditional, such as buying new fashion clothing from a channel through which the need for uniqueness can be manifested, such as a boutique (Burns & Warren, 1995).…”
Section: Need For Uniquenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burns and Warren, 1995;Spies, Hesse and Loesch, 1997;Grewal, Baker, Levy and Voss, 2003], work investigating these effects at the geographical shopping centre level remains sporadic. The quality of the shopping experience is generally thought to have a positive effect on customers' behavioural intentions [Tai and Fung, 1997;Wakefield and Baker, 1998], with enjoyment of shopping as a pleasurable experience associated with raised patronage [Mano, 1999].…”
Section: Repatronagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose three retail venues located in low-income regions of the city, by means of a judgment sample, seeking to represent retail agglomerations of varied sizes and different regions. In this respect, we took advantage of the data from a previous study of street shopping districts conducted in the city of São Paulo by Parente, Miotto & Barki (2008 Wakefield & Baker (1998), Woodside & Trappey (1992) and Burns & Warren (1995). For the prejudice construct, we adapted the scale developed by Brumbaugh & Rosa (2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%