2011
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Need for a consensus on the methods by which to measure joint mobility and the definition of norms for hypermobility that reflect age, gender and ethnic-dependent variation: is revision of criteria for joint hypermobility syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type indicated?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
77
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta-analysis showed that the sex difference in the 2D:4D length ratio was largest in the right hand and is possibly a better indicator of prenatal androgenization (7). However, the reasons for this side difference are unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis showed that the sex difference in the 2D:4D length ratio was largest in the right hand and is possibly a better indicator of prenatal androgenization (7). However, the reasons for this side difference are unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectral disorder of inherent joint hypermobility is a commonly recognized syndrome (20,21), which is genetically determined (33,34). A question therefore arises: can MHT also be differentiated as a constitutional variant?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resistance an examiner feels on passive stretching could also be attributed to connective tissue elasticity or laxity (16,19). Range of joint mobility varies considerably in the normal population, depending upon age, gender, and ethnic origin (20,21). Correlations occur in the ROMs of different joints studied in individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A further set of diagnostic criteria, including common features such as functional bowel disorder, cardiovascular dysautomia, has been proposed [35], but it is not yet validated. The revision of the EDS nosology is required [36], for unifying available diagnostic criteria.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%