2018
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcy102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nectar supplementation changes pollinator behaviour and pollination mode inPedicularis dichotoma: implications for evolutionary transitions

Abstract: Our study is the first to quantify variation in nectar production in a supposedly 'nectarless' Pedicularis species. Flower manipulations by adding nectar suggested that gain (or loss) of nectar would quickly result in an adaptive behavioural shift in the pollinator, producing a new location for pollen deposition and stigma contact without a shift to other pollinators. Frequent gains of nectar in Pedicularis species would be beneficial by enhancing pollinator attraction in unpredictable pollination environments. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is necessary in high mountain systems, because the abundance and efficiency of pollinators and their diversity generally decrease with altitude, which increase the competition pressure with co-flowering plant species (Totland & Sottocornola, 2001; Körner, 2003; Mitchell et al, 2009). For example, increasing nectar in Pedicularis species enhanced pollinator attraction (Tong et al, 2018). Thus, the abaxial nectary present in the species of the HDM clade may be an adaptation to higher altitudes to improve pollinator attraction (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is necessary in high mountain systems, because the abundance and efficiency of pollinators and their diversity generally decrease with altitude, which increase the competition pressure with co-flowering plant species (Totland & Sottocornola, 2001; Körner, 2003; Mitchell et al, 2009). For example, increasing nectar in Pedicularis species enhanced pollinator attraction (Tong et al, 2018). Thus, the abaxial nectary present in the species of the HDM clade may be an adaptation to higher altitudes to improve pollinator attraction (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, in our study, the handling behavior of pollinators was consistent both within and among bee species (and consistent with observations of others, e.g., Dunn, 1956; Harder, 1990) on the bilaterally symmetrical flowers of Lupinus argenteus regardless of the nectar status of flowers. Further, Tong et al (2018) described an increased visitation frequency to nectar‐supplemented flowers, an effect that was absent in L. argenteus . We offer two hypotheses to explain this difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only other experimental field study of which we are aware that compares the effects of nectar only and nectar + pollen reward strategies in a pollen‐rewarding species was performed in the Himalayas by Tong et al (2018). Contrary to the results presented here, Tong et al (2018) describe negative effects of nectar addition on plant reproduction in the pollen‐rewarding Pedicularis dichotoma Bonati (Orobanchaceae). They suggest that these effects are the result of altered body positioning and floral handling in bee pollinators foraging on nectar‐added and nectarless inflorescences owing to the asymmetrical floral architecture of this species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here arises the question about how evolutionary mechanisms can produce networks in the wide range of the specialist–generalist spectrum, when plant and pollinator species often have different interests. The situation is further complicated because plants evolve to attract new pollinators over evolutionary time while pollinators can adapt foraging behaviour within days (Burd, 1995; Tong et al ., 2019). Previous modelling studies have linked specialised pollination networks to scenarios in which the density of a certain species is high and constant over time (Waser et al ., 1996; Sargent and Otto, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%