2012
DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31824fc617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Necrotizing Pancreatitis Associated With Severe Preeclampsia

Abstract: Severe preeclampsia may cause widespread end-organ damage and may affect the gastrointestinal system, resulting in fatal necrotizing pancreatitis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Although the exact causal and temporal relationship of pancreatitis and preeclampsia has not been established, increasingly, case reports and small studies in the literature have attempted to demonstrate an association. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Our findings of an association between hypertensive disease and pancreatitis during pregnancy corroborate these publications.…”
Section: Hacker Et Alsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…20 Although the exact causal and temporal relationship of pancreatitis and preeclampsia has not been established, increasingly, case reports and small studies in the literature have attempted to demonstrate an association. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Our findings of an association between hypertensive disease and pancreatitis during pregnancy corroborate these publications.…”
Section: Hacker Et Alsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The main impact of preeclampsia on the fetus is malnourishment, resulting from uteroplacental vascular insufficiency hypoxia, which restricts nutrient supplies and oxygen flow from the placenta to the fetus [18, 19], which affects approximately 30% of preeclampsia cases. This leads to various perinatal and neonatal problems, including intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR, defined as birth weight less than the 10th percentile) [6, 18, 2025], emergency C-section [6], preterm delivery [24, 26, 27], reduced birth weight [6, 28, 29], lower APGAR scores [30], more frequent and prolonged neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stays [6, 20, 31], and increased acute respiratory distress syndromes after birth [32]. In some cases, fetal damage is so severe that it results in fetal demise, such as stillbirth and neonatal death [32, 33].…”
Section: Preeclampsia Genomic Imprinting and Child Neurobehavioral mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, fetal damage is so severe that it results in fetal demise, such as stillbirth and neonatal death [32, 33]. Beyond birth, while the long-term health and developmental consequences of exposure to maternal preeclampsia for the surviving child are relatively unexplored, there is some evidence for suboptimal neurocognitive development among infants with IUGR [34, 35], which is one of the major fetal/child consequences of preeclampsia [6, 2025]. Recently, with the leadership of the NICHD, growing efforts have been made to find associations between preeclampsia and health consequences in offspring, including IUGR [3436], preterm birth [3740], LBW [4143], and child neurobehavioral development [4446].…”
Section: Preeclampsia Genomic Imprinting and Child Neurobehavioral mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mother’s health, severe preeclampsia may cause symptoms such as hypertension, proteinuria, eclampsia, cerebral edema, cerebral hemorrhage, long-term neuro-cognitive dysfunction, blindness, liver swelling, and other liver damage leading to elevated serum transaminase, oliguria, thrombocytopenia, pulmonary edema necrotizing pancreatitis, all of which could be fatal to mothers and their unborn child in-utero, as well as causing various degree of child morbidity after birth (Williams et al, 2010; Swank, Nageotte, & Hatfield, 2012). The main impact of preeclampsia to the fetus is under-nutrition, resulting from utero-placental vascular insufficiency hypoxia, which restricts nutrient supplies and oxygen flow from the placenta to the fetus (Kajantie, Thornburg, Eriksson, Osmond, & Barker, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%