2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.epag.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neck circumference as a novel screening method for estimating fat distribution and metabolic complications in obese children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In study of Atef et al, NC averages for boys and girls (7 to 12 years) were found 32.9 ± 1.63 and 33.87 ± 1.47 cm, respectively [15]. In this study, subjects with BMI>85 percentile were stratified as being overweight / obese while subjects with a BMI≤85th percentile were stratified as having normal weight.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In study of Atef et al, NC averages for boys and girls (7 to 12 years) were found 32.9 ± 1.63 and 33.87 ± 1.47 cm, respectively [15]. In this study, subjects with BMI>85 percentile were stratified as being overweight / obese while subjects with a BMI≤85th percentile were stratified as having normal weight.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In a study involving 50 healthy weight and 50 obese children, NC of obese children was significantly higher than healthy children for genders. (p=0.000) [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Most of the included articles carried out a cross-sectional design, except for one case-control [ 45 ] and one prospective study [ 46 ]. According to the geographical region, seven of the studies were set out in Europe [ 7 , 14 , 24 , 27 , 29 , 32 , 45 ], eight in America [ 25 , 26 , 33 , 35 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ], eight in Asia [ 28 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 38 , 43 , 44 , 46 ], and three in Africa [ 23 , 36 , 37 ]. Based on the anthropometric indicator, 19 articles approached NC, seven articles WrC, and two studied both anthropometric indicators [ 28 , 31 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropometric measures such as weight and height for calculating body mass index (BMI), waist and hip circumferences (WC and HC) for the calculation of waist/hip ratio are reported to be low-burden standard and effective substitute measures for abdominal adiposity. 7 BMI is a frequent screening tool for detecting excess adiposities (obesity/ overweight) 8 ; it is calculated as weight in kilo gramme divided by height in meters squared (BMI=weight (kg)/ height (m) 2 ). 9,10 Obesity and overweight are therefore defined by BMI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%