1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00970485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for a system described by a nonlinear elliptic equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The established results, representing a development of previously reported works [8,9] by the present author give promise that extended derivatives may successfully replace the classical derivatives in various applications. Among such applications are numerous problems that arise in nonlinear analysis (the implicit function theorem and the Lusternik theorem), in differential topology (notions of differentiable manifold, tangent space, and tangent fibration), in the Lee group theory (relations between Lee groups and Lee algebras), in the theory…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The established results, representing a development of previously reported works [8,9] by the present author give promise that extended derivatives may successfully replace the classical derivatives in various applications. Among such applications are numerous problems that arise in nonlinear analysis (the implicit function theorem and the Lusternik theorem), in differential topology (notions of differentiable manifold, tangent space, and tangent fibration), in the Lee group theory (relations between Lee groups and Lee algebras), in the theory…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…If condition (5) is violated, then relation (8) no longer yields an a priori estimate for the solution of the linearized equation in the space Y , and the right-hand side of (8) even may be meaningless at all because of low regularity of v. Thus, in proving differentiability of the solution of the equation under examination with respect to the first term, one cannot use the inverse function theorem. With the latter fact, lack of differentiability of the operator under consideration still remains to be seen.…”
Section: Regular Casementioning
confidence: 94%