2010
DOI: 10.13031/2013.32066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nebraska Agricultural Water Management Demonstration Network (NAWMDN): Integrating Research and Extension/Outreach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a significant gap still exists in fully reconciling differences between point observations with remote sensing [12] given the natural heterogeneity [13] and spatial organization SWC fields exhibit [14]. With the unresolved issues between point sensors and remote sensing, and critical spatiotemporal gaps from remote sensing observations, production agriculture has typically relied on direct insertion point based SWC monitoring technologies to aid in decision-making [15,16], albeit with recent acceptance of indirect sensors [17]. A key weakness of direct insertion point sensors in production agriculture is often logistical, as routine management practices of planting, soil cultivation, and harvest make installation and maintenance of point sensor networks costly and time consuming to continuously manage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a significant gap still exists in fully reconciling differences between point observations with remote sensing [12] given the natural heterogeneity [13] and spatial organization SWC fields exhibit [14]. With the unresolved issues between point sensors and remote sensing, and critical spatiotemporal gaps from remote sensing observations, production agriculture has typically relied on direct insertion point based SWC monitoring technologies to aid in decision-making [15,16], albeit with recent acceptance of indirect sensors [17]. A key weakness of direct insertion point sensors in production agriculture is often logistical, as routine management practices of planting, soil cultivation, and harvest make installation and maintenance of point sensor networks costly and time consuming to continuously manage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar conclusion was reached in Oklahoma where farmers and ranchers did not want to pay significant fees to have access to weather information beyond raw data [44]. Nevertheless, technology transfer of agricultural water management programs from weather networks via extension and outreach activities remains a high priority in Nebraska [45] and elsewhere. The occurrence of drought events remains a driver for the use and adoption of "smart" irrigation controllers based on ET [46] and in the adoption of information generated from weather networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…While our research approach is specific to our location, climate and crop, we believe that our method has general applications to other regions and crops. Our goal was to identify options to improve the successful adoption of ET-based irrigation as a management tool [45,48]. Our purpose is not to evaluate specific advantages or disadvantages of any particular irrigation system for cotton production in the THP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This WD-3-WET-5Y TDR type soil water potential sensor can simultaneously measure volumetric water content (VWM), electric conductivity (EC) and temperature of the soil. Furthermore, this sensor is rated IP68; this rating means protection from contact with harmful dust and immersion in water with a depth of more than 1 m. Currently for the WSN, the soil water potential seems to be the most suitable measurement item whose aim is irrigation control [10]. For measuring the water potential in soil, it is necessary to measure it at different points in a field, because soil moisture varies even within the same field.…”
Section: Object Fields and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%