2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsc.2015.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nearly optimal refinement of real roots of a univariate polynomial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are confident, however, that also other hybrid methods can be modified in a way to yield comparable complexity bounds. For polynomials with integer coefficients, a recently proposed method [35,36] combines Newton iteration and bisection, achieving similar complexity bounds. In comparison to our approach, their method requires the initial isolating interval I = (a, b) to be small enough such that, except for the isolated root, there is no other (real or non-real) root of f with a distance less than (1 + ε) · b−a 2 to the center mid(I) of I, where (1 + ε) n > 2 for some n = O(log d).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are confident, however, that also other hybrid methods can be modified in a way to yield comparable complexity bounds. For polynomials with integer coefficients, a recently proposed method [35,36] combines Newton iteration and bisection, achieving similar complexity bounds. In comparison to our approach, their method requires the initial isolating interval I = (a, b) to be small enough such that, except for the isolated root, there is no other (real or non-real) root of f with a distance less than (1 + ε) · b−a 2 to the center mid(I) of I, where (1 + ε) n > 2 for some n = O(log d).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall that |p q (ω i )| ≤ τ + 2 lg d + lg lg d + 2 and |p q (ω i ) − p q (ω i )| ≤ −λ + τ lg(2d) + 3/2 lg 2 d + 5/2 lg d + lg lg d + 5 for all i, [11,Lemma 16], and similar bounds hold for pq(ω i ).…”
Section: Boolean Cost Boundsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This would be too costly, and so instead we employ the Moenck-Borodin algorithm, which still enables us to obtain a nearly optimal root-refiner. Technically, in a relatively minor change of our algorithm, we replace the matrix Ω = [ω j(k+1) ] j,k in (3) The Moenck-Borodin algorithm uses nearly linear arithmetic time, and Kirrinnis in [2] proved that this algorithm supports multipoint polynomial evaluation at a low Boolean cost as well (see also [14], [10], [3], [11], [8], [9] for alternative proofs). Consequently our algorithm supporting Corollary 4 can be extended to support a nearly optimal Boolean cost bound for refining all simple isolated roots of a polynomial.…”
Section: Complex Root Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cost of approximating one root of A up to a desired precision is the same as the cost of approximating all the roots [31,33]. It is O B (m 2 n(σ + τ )).…”
Section: An Application: Solving All the Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%