2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2014.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root refinement for real polynomials using quadratic interval refinement

Abstract: We consider the problem of approximating all real roots of a square-free polynomial f with real coefficients. Given isolating intervals for the real roots and an arbitrary positive integer L, the task is to approximate each root to L bits after the binary point. Abbott has proposed the quadratic interval refinement method (QIR for short), which is a variant of Regula Falsi combining the secant method and bisection. We formulate a variant of QIR, denoted AQIR ("Approximate QIR"), that considers only approximati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…bit operations, Namely, Algorithm 3 3 succeeds with an absolute precision bounded by O(log |F (x C )| −1 ) and, within Algorithm 3 3, we need to approximately evaluate F and F at the point x C to such a precision; see also [20 20,Lemma 3] for the cost of evaluating a polynomial of degree n to a certain precision. If we pass line 1 1, then we must have |F (x C )| > |F (x C )| 6r(C) .…”
Section: Bit Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bit operations, Namely, Algorithm 3 3 succeeds with an absolute precision bounded by O(log |F (x C )| −1 ) and, within Algorithm 3 3, we need to approximately evaluate F and F at the point x C to such a precision; see also [20 20,Lemma 3] for the cost of evaluating a polynomial of degree n to a certain precision. If we pass line 1 1, then we must have |F (x C )| > |F (x C )| 6r(C) .…”
Section: Bit Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They combine a fast convergence method (i.e., the secant method and Newton iteration, respectively) with approximate arithmetic and efficient multipoint evaluation; however, there are details missing in [31] when using multipoint evaluation. In order to achieve complexity bounds comparable to the one stated in Theorem 3, the methods from [18,31] need as input isolating intervals whose size is comparable to the separation of the corresponding root, that is, the roots must be "well isolated". This is typically achieved by using a fast method, such as Pan's method, for complex root isolation first.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2 · n/2 } is a multipoint of size 2 · n/2 + 1. (B) execution of the 0-Test/1-Test for an interval (a , b ) ⊂ (a, b), where a and b are admissiblepoints of corresponding multipoints contained in I 18.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, exact evaluation of a sparse polynomial at a rational point (even of small bitsize) is expensive as the output has bitsize linear in n. Instead, we consider approximate evaluation, which allows us to evaluate a sparse polynomial f as in (1.1) at an arbitrary point x ∈ (0, 1 + 1/n) to an absolute error less than 2 −L in a time that is polynomial 2 in log n, k, τ, and L. More precisely, we derive the following result: Proof. In essence, we follow the same approach as in [7]. That is, for a fixed non-negative integer K, we perform each occurring operation • (i.e.…”
Section: Polynomial Arithmeticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additional cost for refining isolating intervals to a size less than 2 −τ , and thus for computing L-bit approximations of all real roots, is Õ(nτ ); e.g. see [7,10,13,16]. Notice that, for k−nomials with integer coefficients, the above bounds are not polynomial in the size of the sparse input representation of f , which is bounded by O(k(log n + τ )) as we need log n bits to store each exponent ei and τ + 1 bits to store each fi.…”
Section: Introduction 11 Problem Definition and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%