Abstract:Tedera (Bituminaria bituminosa var. albomarginata) is a perennial legume native to Lanzarote, an island within the Canary Islands; known for its dry environment. It is a plant known as a grazing option within that island. Tedera was tested for its potential as an optional feed source for sheep grazing under Western Australian conditions, also known for its frequent periods of drought stress. Four sets each of 35 seasonal samples were taken from seven accessions of the legume, in an area known to have less than… Show more
“…The intrinsic morphological traits such as leaf and stem mass fraction seem to have stronger effects on the forage aptitude than possible mismatches of the phenology between the three varieties. CP (15.0%), NDF (34.8%) and ADF (26.6%) stem and leaf average concentration of BAM were very similar to the concentrations also evaluated by near‐infrared analysis for the same variety by Adriansz et al., (2017), CP (15.0%), NDF (37.6%) and ADF (26.6%). However, it would be worth investigating the drought stress effect on phenology of the studied varieties since it would directly affect their nutritive value.…”
Morphological traits, nutritive values and physiological responses to two different water regimes of three Bituminaria bituminosa varieties: var. albomarginata, var. crassiuscula and var. bituminosa were evaluated in a greenhouse experiment. Two water regimes were imposed for 63 days; well‐watered (WW) plants and deficit‐watered (DW) plants, both starting from a high soil water content (dripping point). The three varieties showed similar aerial biomass reduction under reduced watering, 50% for var. albomarginata, 51% for var. bituminosa and 43% for var. crassiuscula. Var. Albomarginata showed lower shoot biomass under both water regimes than var. bituminosa (56.2% in WW plants and 55.2% in DW plants) and var. crassiuscula (52% in WW plants and 57.8% in DW plants). This lower shoot biomass could be attributed to the high initial soil water content imposed in this experiment, affecting early development. This hypothesis is supported by the lower root biomass production of var. albomarginata and its distribution. The DW treatment of this experiment was not sufficiently restrictive to cause morphological modifications, whilst of the forage quality variables analysed, only ash was affected. Var. crassiuscula and var. albomarginata had a lower specific leaf area (239 cm2 g‐1 and 235 cm2 g‐1, respectively) than var. bituminosa (352 cm2 g‐1), which might represent an important adaptation to high light intensity and temperature conditions. The values of stem mass fraction (SMF) and leaf mass fraction (LMF) for var. crassiuscula (SMF = 0.36 and LMF = 0.28) and var. albomarginata (SMF = 0.35 and LMF = 0.36) indicated better forage aptitude of these varieties than var. bituminosa (SMF = 0.50 and LMF = 0.19). All varieties showed good values of crude protein and digestibility, although important differences were found between leaf and stem. According to the studied morphological, nutritional and physiological traits, var. albomarginata showed the best aptitude for being introduced as permanent grasslands in some Mediterranean farming systems. However, the possible susceptibility of var. albomarginata to high water content in the soil could limit its introduction. These results help to inform the potential use of these three Canarian B. bituminosa varieties to improve Mediterranean rainfed grasslands of extensive farming systems.
“…The intrinsic morphological traits such as leaf and stem mass fraction seem to have stronger effects on the forage aptitude than possible mismatches of the phenology between the three varieties. CP (15.0%), NDF (34.8%) and ADF (26.6%) stem and leaf average concentration of BAM were very similar to the concentrations also evaluated by near‐infrared analysis for the same variety by Adriansz et al., (2017), CP (15.0%), NDF (37.6%) and ADF (26.6%). However, it would be worth investigating the drought stress effect on phenology of the studied varieties since it would directly affect their nutritive value.…”
Morphological traits, nutritive values and physiological responses to two different water regimes of three Bituminaria bituminosa varieties: var. albomarginata, var. crassiuscula and var. bituminosa were evaluated in a greenhouse experiment. Two water regimes were imposed for 63 days; well‐watered (WW) plants and deficit‐watered (DW) plants, both starting from a high soil water content (dripping point). The three varieties showed similar aerial biomass reduction under reduced watering, 50% for var. albomarginata, 51% for var. bituminosa and 43% for var. crassiuscula. Var. Albomarginata showed lower shoot biomass under both water regimes than var. bituminosa (56.2% in WW plants and 55.2% in DW plants) and var. crassiuscula (52% in WW plants and 57.8% in DW plants). This lower shoot biomass could be attributed to the high initial soil water content imposed in this experiment, affecting early development. This hypothesis is supported by the lower root biomass production of var. albomarginata and its distribution. The DW treatment of this experiment was not sufficiently restrictive to cause morphological modifications, whilst of the forage quality variables analysed, only ash was affected. Var. crassiuscula and var. albomarginata had a lower specific leaf area (239 cm2 g‐1 and 235 cm2 g‐1, respectively) than var. bituminosa (352 cm2 g‐1), which might represent an important adaptation to high light intensity and temperature conditions. The values of stem mass fraction (SMF) and leaf mass fraction (LMF) for var. crassiuscula (SMF = 0.36 and LMF = 0.28) and var. albomarginata (SMF = 0.35 and LMF = 0.36) indicated better forage aptitude of these varieties than var. bituminosa (SMF = 0.50 and LMF = 0.19). All varieties showed good values of crude protein and digestibility, although important differences were found between leaf and stem. According to the studied morphological, nutritional and physiological traits, var. albomarginata showed the best aptitude for being introduced as permanent grasslands in some Mediterranean farming systems. However, the possible susceptibility of var. albomarginata to high water content in the soil could limit its introduction. These results help to inform the potential use of these three Canarian B. bituminosa varieties to improve Mediterranean rainfed grasslands of extensive farming systems.
“…Samples were oven dried at 60 • C until there was no weight change and the dry matter of the harvested fresh tedera (DM% (Fresh)) of all accessions was determined. Ground ovendried samples (DM% (Lab)) were analysed using standard wet chemistry techniques by the methods outlined in AFIA (2011) at the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries accredited (NATA) laboratory and also with near-infrared spectrophotometry [24]. This included: crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), ash, dry matter digestibility (DMD), organic matter digestibility (DOMD), estimated metabolisable energy content (ME), organic matter (OM), Nitrate-N; fat and non-structural carbohydrates (NSC).…”
Tedera is a valuable high-quality forage for sheep during summer–autumn. There is evidence that prior grazing experience of novel forages influences preference and haymaking of tedera improves preference by goats. In the first experiment, it was hypothesised that the voluntary feed intake (VFI) of fresh leaves and stems of tedera by sheep would be greater for experienced vs. naïve sheep. In the second experiment, it was hypothesised that the VFI of naïve sheep fed wilted leaves and stems of tedera would be greater than fresh leaves and stems of tedera. To test these hypotheses, adult Merino sheep were fed seven accessions of tedera, in two outdoor pen feeding experiments conducted consecutively. Each of six pens had 14 feeders, two for each accession, and two sheep. In experiment 1, three pens had sheep that had previously grazed tedera (experienced) and three pens had sheep with no experience (naïve), and all were fed fresh leaves and stems of the seven tedera accessions. Experiment 2 involved only naïve sheep, with three pens fed fresh leaves and stems and three pens fed wilted leaves and stems of the seven tedera accessions. Preference was measured each day for six days in experiment 1; and for five days in experiment 2 by calculating the average differences of feed offered and feed remaining from the feeders. In experiment 1, experienced sheep showed no difference in preference (average percentage eaten) in the first hour of each day compared to naïve sheep (70% vs. 56% DM intake (kg), p = 0.27). There was an increase in the amount eaten from the first to the last day for both groups, except for the intake of one accession that was reduced for the experienced sheep. In experiment 2, there was no statistical difference in preference between accessions. However, when the average percentage eaten by the experienced and naïve groups are combined, they are strongly correlated, with significant differences between accessions. Sheep did not eat more wilted tedera compared to fresh, which did not support our hypothesis. The only differences we found in sheep preference for tedera accessions occurred in experiment 1. Further studies to investigate seasonal differences in sheep preference between accessions is required and increased replication is needed to better determine the effect of prior grazing experience on the preference for tedera accessions.
Tedera (Bituminaria bituminosa C.H Stirt. vars. albomarginata and crassiuscula) is a traditional forage species for goats in the Canary Islands, Spain. It has agronomic characteristics ideally suited to Mediterranean-like climates that allows it to provide high quality green forage for grazing animals during summer and autumn. It can be used to extend the growing season into late spring and early summer and/or to reduce or eliminate the need for expensive hand feeding of grain and hay to sheep to fill the ‘feed gap’ during the dry season in southern Australian farming systems. Three sheep grazing experiments were carried out with the objective to evaluate sheep production during summer and autumn with tedera as the sole diet. A 3-ha site at Dandaragan, Western Australia was grazed during the summer and autumn of 2014–2015 and 2016 and a 2.4-ha site was grazed at Kojonup, Western Australia during the same period in 2016. At each site, two grazing treatments were evaluated, continuous grazing and rotational grazing with six plots (14 days of grazing and 70 days of recovery). The first hypothesis tested was that tedera plants would not survive continuous grazing during summer and autumn. The second hypothesis tested was that without hand feeding, 10 dry sheep equivalents/ha would be able to at least maintain weight and condition score during summer and autumn. The third hypothesis tested was that rotational grazing would improve the production of the sheep (liveweight and condition score) compared with continuous grazing. The first hypothesis was rejected, the population of tedera plants did not significantly decline due to being continuously grazed during summer and autumn. The second hypothesis was confirmed, at the three experimental sites, 10 dry sheep equivalents/ha were able to at least maintain weight and condition score without any hand feeding. The third hypothesis was partially rejected; continuous grazing had a better performance of the sheep than rotational grazing. However, the rotational grazing plots had more tedera on offer in the remaining grazing plots in the rotation with the potential for a longer grazing time. These three experiments clearly demonstrate that tedera can be used to reduce or eliminate expensive hand feeding during summer and autumn using the simplest and least expensive grazing management; continuous grazing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.