2008
DOI: 10.1126/science.1154753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-Field Plates: Subdiffraction Focusing with Patterned Surfaces

Abstract: Air Force Materiel Command REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
201
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
201
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…22) and further developed by Pendry et al in 2000, 23 is a planar slab whose electric permittivity and magnetic permeability both assume the values of -1 at a given frequency; a source placed on one side of the perfect lens is reproduced as an image on the other side of the slab, with both far-and near-fields refocused to the image. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] In the WPT context, the perfect lens geometry is a good starting point for improving the efficiency of coupling between two coils. Viewing the first coil as a source, any loss in transfer efficiency to the receiver can be explained using the concept of magnetic flux divergence, which is bound to happen at distances greatly exceeding the dimensions of the source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22) and further developed by Pendry et al in 2000, 23 is a planar slab whose electric permittivity and magnetic permeability both assume the values of -1 at a given frequency; a source placed on one side of the perfect lens is reproduced as an image on the other side of the slab, with both far-and near-fields refocused to the image. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] In the WPT context, the perfect lens geometry is a good starting point for improving the efficiency of coupling between two coils. Viewing the first coil as a source, any loss in transfer efficiency to the receiver can be explained using the concept of magnetic flux divergence, which is bound to happen at distances greatly exceeding the dimensions of the source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results therefore suggest that the f = 6.1 m lens works close to its theoretical limit. Subdiffraction focusing elements based on near-field effects were reported to be able to focus electromagnetic waves to a spot of size less than /10 [46][47][48]. However, the focal length is limited to dimensions much less than the wavelength, which is about 100 times less than our devices.…”
Section: Experiments On Plsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The second method relies on modification of the individual antenna element to achieve a focused near-field distribution. Within this framework, the use of microwave near-field plates, whose ability to achieve focusing in near-field has been recently demonstrated [20], seems very promising. Also, the use of appropriate modifications such as incorporating a dielectric director [21] into the individual antenna element is another possibility.…”
Section: Numerical Model For Incident Field Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%